# |
Drużyna |
SR |
W |
R |
P |
GF |
GA |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
W% |
ØGF |
ØGA |
1. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
24 |
19 |
4 |
1 |
65 |
15 |
+50 |
61 |
2.54 |
79% |
2.71 |
0.62 |
2. | Chengdu Tiancheng |
24 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
54 |
14 |
+40 |
55 |
2.29 |
67% |
2.25 |
0.58 |
3. | Jiangsu Suning |
24 |
14 |
6 |
4 |
41 |
21 |
+20 |
48 |
2.00 |
58% |
1.71 |
0.88 |
4. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
24 |
13 |
5 |
6 |
34 |
22 |
+12 |
44 |
1.83 |
54% |
1.42 |
0.92 |
5. | Shanghai Shenxin |
24 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
26 |
27 |
-1 |
36 |
1.50 |
42% |
1.08 |
1.12 |
6. | Yanbian Fude |
24 |
9 |
6 |
9 |
36 |
35 |
+1 |
33 |
1.38 |
38% |
1.50 |
1.46 |
7. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
24 |
10 |
3 |
11 |
27 |
36 |
-9 |
33 |
1.38 |
42% |
1.12 |
1.50 |
8. | Shanghai Zobon |
24 |
7 |
5 |
12 |
26 |
37 |
-11 |
26 |
1.08 |
29% |
1.08 |
1.54 |
9. | Beijing Sport Univer |
24 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
22 |
31 |
-9 |
24 |
1.00 |
25% |
0.92 |
1.29 |
10. | Nanjing Yoyo |
24 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
26 |
39 |
-13 |
24 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.08 |
1.62 |
11. | Beijing 361º |
24 |
5 |
7 |
12 |
27 |
40 |
-13 |
22 |
0.92 |
21% |
1.12 |
1.67 |
12. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
24 |
4 |
7 |
13 |
18 |
36 |
-18 |
19 |
0.79 |
17% |
0.75 |
1.50 |
13. | Hohhot Black Horse |
24 |
1 |
4 |
19 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
7 |
0.29 |
4% |
0.33 |
2.38 |
# |
Drużyna |
SR |
W |
R |
P |
GF |
GA |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
W% |
ØGF |
ØGA |
1. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
12 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
43 |
7 |
+36 |
34 |
2.83 |
92% |
3.58 |
0.58 |
2. | Jiangsu Suning |
12 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
25 |
10 |
+15 |
29 |
2.42 |
75% |
2.08 |
0.83 |
3. | Chengdu Tiancheng |
12 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
36 |
8 |
+28 |
27 |
2.25 |
67% |
3.00 |
0.67 |
4. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
12 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
20 |
10 |
+10 |
26 |
2.17 |
67% |
1.67 |
0.83 |
5. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
13 |
7 |
+6 |
24 |
2.00 |
58% |
1.08 |
0.58 |
6. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
12 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
10 |
+4 |
22 |
1.83 |
58% |
1.17 |
0.83 |
7. | Yanbian Fude |
12 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
22 |
14 |
+8 |
21 |
1.75 |
50% |
1.83 |
1.17 |
8. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
18 |
16 |
+2 |
17 |
1.42 |
42% |
1.50 |
1.33 |
9. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
16 |
15 |
+1 |
17 |
1.42 |
42% |
1.33 |
1.25 |
10. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
14 |
12 |
+2 |
15 |
1.25 |
25% |
1.17 |
1.00 |
11. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
11 |
14 |
-3 |
13 |
1.08 |
25% |
0.92 |
1.17 |
12. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
12 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
11 |
14 |
-3 |
10 |
0.83 |
17% |
0.92 |
1.17 |
13. | Hohhot Black Horse |
12 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
24 |
-18 |
6 |
0.50 |
8% |
0.50 |
2.00 |
# |
Drużyna |
SR |
W |
R |
P |
GF |
GA |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
W% |
ØGF |
ØGA |
1. | Chengdu Tiancheng |
12 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
18 |
6 |
+12 |
28 |
2.33 |
67% |
1.50 |
0.50 |
2. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
12 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
22 |
8 |
+14 |
27 |
2.25 |
67% |
1.83 |
0.67 |
3. | Jiangsu Suning |
12 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
16 |
11 |
+5 |
19 |
1.58 |
42% |
1.33 |
0.92 |
4. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
12 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
14 |
12 |
+2 |
18 |
1.50 |
42% |
1.17 |
1.00 |
5. | Yanbian Fude |
12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
21 |
-7 |
12 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.17 |
1.75 |
6. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
13 |
20 |
-7 |
12 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.08 |
1.67 |
7. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
11 |
17 |
-6 |
11 |
0.92 |
25% |
0.92 |
1.42 |
8. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
12 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
26 |
-13 |
11 |
0.92 |
25% |
1.08 |
2.17 |
9. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
22 |
-12 |
9 |
0.75 |
17% |
0.83 |
1.83 |
10. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
12 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
22 |
-15 |
9 |
0.75 |
17% |
0.58 |
1.83 |
11. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
13 |
28 |
-15 |
7 |
0.58 |
17% |
1.08 |
2.33 |
12. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
23 |
-15 |
7 |
0.58 |
8% |
0.67 |
1.92 |
13. | Hohhot Black Horse |
12 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
2 |
33 |
-31 |
1 |
0.08 |
0% |
0.17 |
2.75 |
Naciśnij na wybranej kolumnie w celu posortowania danych Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds | Wybierz Sezon
Official Site
Wikipedia |