Mistrzostwa świata U20 1979 @ Japonia

Zestawienie Serii
Wyniki
Form
Zbliżające się Spotkania
Sezon
Statystyki Specjalne
Power Ratings

Fase de Grupos

Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	R	P	GF	GA	Diff	Pts	Pts/G	W%	ØGF	ØGA
1.	Hiszpania U20	3	2	0	1	3	2	+1	6	2.00	67%	1.00	0.67
2.	Algieria U20	3	1	2	0	2	1	+1	5	1.67	33%	0.67	0.33
3.	Meksyk U20	3	0	2	1	3	4	-1	2	0.67	0%	1.00	1.33
4.	Japonia U20	3	0	2	1	1	2	-1	2	0.67	0%	0.33	0.67

Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	R	P	GF	GA	Diff	Pts	Pts/G	W%	ØGF	ØGA
1.	Argentyna U20	3	3	0	0	10	1	+9	9	3.00	100%	3.33	0.33
2.	Polska U20	3	2	0	1	9	4	+5	6	2.00	67%	3.00	1.33
3.	Jugosławia U20	3	1	0	2	5	3	+2	3	1.00	33%	1.67	1.00
4.	Indonezja U20	3	0	0	3	0	16	-16	0	0.00	0%	0.00	5.33

Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	R	P	GF	GA	Diff	Pts	Pts/G	W%	ØGF	ØGA
1.	Paragwaj U20	3	2	0	1	6	1	+5	6	2.00	67%	2.00	0.33
2.	Portugalia U20	3	1	1	1	2	3	-1	4	1.33	33%	0.67	1.00
3.	Korea Południowa U20	3	1	1	1	1	3	-2	4	1.33	33%	0.33	1.00
4.	Kanada U20	3	1	0	2	3	5	-2	3	1.00	33%	1.00	1.67

Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	R	P	GF	GA	Diff	Pts	Pts/G	W%	ØGF	ØGA
1.	Urugwaj U20	3	3	0	0	8	0	+8	9	3.00	100%	2.67	0.00
2.	Soviet Union U20	3	2	0	1	8	2	+6	6	2.00	67%	2.67	0.67
3.	Węgry U20	3	1	0	2	3	7	-4	3	1.00	33%	1.00	2.33
4.	Gwinea U20	3	0	0	3	0	10	-10	0	0.00	0%	0.00	3.33

Naciśnij na wybranej kolumnie w celu posortowania danych
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Wybierz Sezon

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Official Site

Wikipedia

Piątek 7. wrzesień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Playoffs - Finals		1979	Kursy 1x2
Argentyna U20	3 - 1	Soviet Union U20

Czwartek 6. wrzesień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Playoffs - Bronze		1979	Kursy 1x2
Urugwaj U20	2 - 1 pen	Polska U20

Wtorek 4. wrzesień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals		1979	Kursy 1x2
Argentyna U20	2 - 0	Urugwaj U20
Polska U20	0 - 1	Soviet Union U20

Niedziela 2. wrzesień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals		1979	Kursy 1x2
Argentyna U20	5 - 0	Algieria U20
Paragwaj U20	2 - 3 pen	Soviet Union U20
Hiszpania U20	0 - 1 pen	Polska U20
Urugwaj U20	1 - 0 AET	Portugalia U20

Czwartek 30. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group B		1979	Kursy 1x2
Polska U20	1 - 4	Argentyna U20
Jugosławia U20	5 - 0	Indonezja U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group D		1979	Kursy 1x2
Węgry U20	2 - 0	Gwinea U20
Soviet Union U20	0 - 1	Urugwaj U20

środa 29. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group A		1979	Kursy 1x2
Japonia U20	1 - 1	Meksyk U20
Hiszpania U20	0 - 1	Algieria U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group C		1979	Kursy 1x2
Kanada U20	0 - 3	Paragwaj U20
Portugalia U20	0 - 0	Korea Południowa U20

Wtorek 28. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group B		1979	Kursy 1x2
Indonezja U20	0 - 6	Polska U20
Jugosławia U20	0 - 1	Argentyna U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group D		1979	Kursy 1x2
Gwinea U20	0 - 3	Soviet Union U20
Węgry U20	0 - 2	Urugwaj U20

Poniedziałek 27. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group A		1979	Kursy 1x2
Algieria U20	0 - 0	Japonia U20
Hiszpania U20	2 - 1	Meksyk U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group C		1979	Kursy 1x2
Portugalia U20	1 - 0	Paragwaj U20
Korea Południowa U20	1 - 0	Kanada U20

Niedziela 26. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group B		1979	Kursy 1x2
Argentyna U20	5 - 0	Indonezja U20
Polska U20	2 - 0	Jugosławia U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group D		1979	Kursy 1x2
Soviet Union U20	5 - 1	Węgry U20
Urugwaj U20	5 - 0	Gwinea U20

Sobota 25. sierpień 1979

Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group A		1979	Kursy 1x2
Japonia U20	0 - 1	Hiszpania U20
Meksyk U20	1 - 1	Algieria U20
Mistrzostwa świata U20 - Group C		1979	Kursy 1x2
Kanada U20	3 - 1	Portugalia U20
Paragwaj U20	3 - 0	Korea Południowa U20

Więcej Wyników

wrzesień 1979
sierpień 1979

Algieria U20
Argentyna U20
Gwinea U20
Hiszpania U20
Indonezja U20
Japonia U20
Jugosławia U20
Kanada U20
Korea Południowa U
Meksyk U20
Paragwaj U20
Polska U20
Portugalia U20
Soviet Union U20
Urugwaj U20
Węgry U20

Wybierz Sezon

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Official Site

Wikipedia

Ostatnie 6 Spotkania

#	Drużyna	SR	W	R	P	GF	GA	Diff	Pts	Pts/G	W%	ØGF	ØGA
1.	Argentyna U20	6	6	0	0	20	2	+18	18	3.00	100%	3.33	0.33
2.	Urugwaj U20	6	3	0	1	11	3	+8	9	1.50	83%	1.50	0.50
3.	Soviet Union U20	6	3	0	2	13	7	+6	9	1.50	67%	2.00	1.17
4.	Polska U20	6	2	0	2	11	7	+4	6	1.00	50%	1.67	1.00
5.	Paragwaj U20	4	2	0	1	8	4	+4	6	1.50	50%	2.00	0.75
6.	Hiszpania U20	4	2	0	1	3	3	0	6	1.50	50%	0.75	0.50
7.	Algieria U20	4	1	2	1	2	6	-4	5	1.25	25%	0.50	1.50
8.	Portugalia U20	4	1	1	1	2	4	-2	4	1.00	25%	0.50	0.75
9.	Korea Południowa U20	3	1	1	1	1	3	-2	4	1.33	33%	0.33	1.00
10.	Jugosławia U20	3	1	0	2	5	3	+2	3	1.00	33%	1.67	1.00
11.	Kanada U20	3	1	0	2	3	5	-2	3	1.00	33%	1.00	1.67
12.	Węgry U20	3	1	0	2	3	7	-4	3	1.00	33%	1.00	2.33
13.	Meksyk U20	3	0	2	1	3	4	-1	2	0.67	0%	1.00	1.33
14.	Japonia U20	3	0	2	1	1	2	-1	2	0.67	0%	0.33	0.67
15.	Gwinea U20	3	0	0	3	0	10	-10	0	0.00	0%	0.00	3.33
16.	Indonezja U20	3	0	0	3	0	16	-16	0	0.00	0%	0.00	5.33

Sezon		Gier	1	x	2	¦	1	2	¦	Ponad 2.5	Poniżej 2.5	Ponad 1.5	Poniżej 1.5	Home Advantage
2023	Group Stage	36	38.9%	16.7%	44.4%	¦	46.7%	53.3%	¦	63.9%	36.1%	80.6%	19.4%	-6.7%
2023	Playoffy	16	43.8%	12.5%	43.8%	¦	56.3%	43.8%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	68.8%	31.3%	12.5%
2019	Group Stage	36	36.1%	16.7%	47.2%	¦	43.3%	56.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	77.8%	22.2%	-13.3%
2019	Playoffy	16	37.5%	25.0%	37.5%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	62.5%	37.5%	0.0%
2017	Group Stage	36	44.4%	25.0%	30.6%	¦	59.3%	40.7%	¦	47.2%	52.8%	72.2%	27.8%	18.5%
2017	Playoffy	16	25.0%	43.8%	31.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	56.3%	43.8%	0.0%
2015	Group Stage	36	36.1%	16.7%	47.2%	¦	43.3%	56.7%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	86.1%	13.9%	-13.3%
2015	Playoffy	16	25.0%	50.0%	25.0%	¦	56.3%	43.8%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	62.5%	37.5%	12.5%
2013	Group Stage	36	30.6%	25.0%	44.4%	¦	40.7%	59.3%	¦	61.1%	38.9%	83.3%	16.7%	-18.5%
2013	Playoffy	16	31.3%	43.8%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	81.3%	18.8%	25.0%
2011	Group Stage	36	47.2%	25.0%	27.8%	¦	63.0%	37.0%	¦	38.9%	61.1%	66.7%	33.3%	25.9%
2011	Playoffy	16	56.3%	37.5%	6.3%	¦	87.5%	12.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	68.8%	31.3%	75.0%
2009	Group Stage	36	47.2%	19.4%	33.3%	¦	58.6%	41.4%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	83.3%	16.7%	17.2%
2009	Playoffy	16	25.0%	43.8%	31.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	43.8%	56.3%	87.5%	12.5%	0.0%
2007	Group Stage	36	36.1%	27.8%	36.1%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	47.2%	52.8%	69.4%	30.6%	0.0%
2007	Playoffy	16	31.3%	37.5%	31.3%	¦	56.3%	43.8%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	68.8%	31.3%	12.5%
2005	Group Stage	36	47.2%	19.4%	33.3%	¦	58.6%	41.4%	¦	47.2%	52.8%	75.0%	25.0%	17.2%
2005	Playoffy	16	50.0%	18.8%	31.3%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	68.8%	31.3%	81.3%	18.8%	25.0%
2003	Group Stage	36	38.9%	22.2%	38.9%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	38.9%	61.1%	63.9%	36.1%	0.0%
2003	Playoffy	16	31.3%	37.5%	31.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	18.8%	81.3%	56.3%	43.8%	0.0%
2001	Group Stage	36	27.8%	22.2%	50.0%	¦	35.7%	64.3%	¦	52.8%	47.2%	75.0%	25.0%	-28.6%
2001	Playoffy	16	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	81.3%	18.8%	0.0%
1999	Group Stage	36	47.2%	16.7%	36.1%	¦	56.7%	43.3%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	75.0%	25.0%	13.3%
1999	Playoffy	16	43.8%	31.3%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	93.8%	6.3%	25.0%
1997	Group Stage	36	27.8%	25.0%	47.2%	¦	37.0%	63.0%	¦	61.1%	38.9%	80.6%	19.4%	-25.9%
1997	Playoffy	16	31.3%	25.0%	43.8%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	43.8%	56.3%	75.0%	25.0%	0.0%
1995	Group Stage	24	29.2%	25.0%	45.8%	¦	38.9%	61.1%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	83.3%	16.7%	-22.2%
1995	Playoffy	8	50.0%	12.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	87.5%	12.5%	25.0%
1993	Group Stage	24	33.3%	29.2%	37.5%	¦	47.1%	52.9%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	79.2%	20.8%	-5.9%
1993	Playoffy	8	37.5%	25.0%	37.5%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	87.5%	12.5%	0.0%
1991	Group Stage	24	41.7%	29.2%	29.2%	¦	58.8%	41.2%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	62.5%	37.5%	17.6%
1991	Playoffy	8	37.5%	50.0%	12.5%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
1989	Group Stage	24	45.8%	8.3%	45.8%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	70.8%	29.2%	0.0%
1989	Playoffy	8	62.5%	25.0%	12.5%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	62.5%	37.5%	50.0%
1987	Group Stage	24	45.8%	16.7%	37.5%	¦	55.0%	45.0%	¦	54.2%	45.8%	79.2%	20.8%	10.0%
1987	Playoffy	8	37.5%	37.5%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	87.5%	12.5%	50.0%
1985	Group Stage	24	29.2%	29.2%	41.7%	¦	41.2%	58.8%	¦	45.8%	54.2%	75.0%	25.0%	-17.6%
1985	Playoffy	8	37.5%	37.5%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	25.0%
1983	Group Stage	24	50.0%	16.7%	33.3%	¦	60.0%	40.0%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	79.2%	20.8%	20.0%
1983	Playoffy	8	25.0%	25.0%	50.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	-25.0%
1981	Group Stage	24	29.2%	33.3%	37.5%	¦	43.8%	56.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	66.7%	33.3%	-12.5%
1981	Playoffy	8	62.5%	12.5%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	62.5%	37.5%	25.0%
1979	Group Stage	24	45.8%	16.7%	37.5%	¦	55.0%	45.0%	¦	45.8%	54.2%	66.7%	33.3%	10.0%
1979	Playoffy	8	37.5%	50.0%	12.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	25.0%
1977	Group Stage	24	41.7%	25.0%	33.3%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	70.8%	29.2%	11.1%
1977	Playoffy	4	25.0%	75.0%	0.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	75.0%	25.0%	0.0%

Naciśnij na wybranej kolumnie w celu posortowania danych
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Statystyki Bramkowe & Goal difference

Half Time / Full Time

AnnaBet Power Ratings

Updated 2025-03-19 11:01:52

#	Drużyna	Rating
1.	Hiszpania U20	1334
2.	Korea Południowa U20	1323
3.	Argentyna U20	1312
4.	Meksyk U20	1210
5.	Urugwaj U20	1203
6.	Paragwaj U20	1162
7.	Japonia U20	1156
8.	Kanada U20	1151
9.	Portugalia U20	1126
10.	Polska U20	1103
11.	Węgry U20	1089
12.	Gwinea U20	1070
13.	Algieria U20	1023
14.	Indonezja U20	1007
15.	Soviet Union U20
16.	Jugosławia U20

Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference in Ratings	Higher Rated	Lower Rated
0	0.500	0.500
10	0.514	0.486
20	0.529	0.471
30	0.543	0.457
40	0.557	0.443
50	0.571	0.429
60	0.585	0.415
70	0.599	0.401
80	0.613	0.387
90	0.627	0.373
100	0.640	0.360
110	0.653	0.347
120	0.666	0.334
130	0.679	0.321
140	0.691	0.309
150	0.703	0.297
160	0.715	0.285
170	0.727	0.273
180	0.738	0.262
190	0.749	0.251
200	0.760	0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.