EuroChallenge 2009-2010

Zestawienie Serii
Wyniki
Form
Zbliżające się Spotkania
Sezon
Statystyki Specjalne

2nd Round
Group Stage
2nd Round Liczba gier u siebie
Group Stage Liczba gier u siebie
2nd Round Liczba gier na wyjeździe
Group Stage Liczba gier na wyjeździe

2nd Round Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	6	5	1	83%	87.8	72.5	+15.3
2.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	6	4	2	67%	76.8	71.7	+5.2
3.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	6	2	4	33%	74.0	83.0	-9.0
4.	Proteas EKA AEL	6	1	5	17%	75.0	86.5	-11.5

2nd Round Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	FMP Železnik	6	4	2	67%	77.0	73.5	+3.5
2.	KK Zagreb	6	4	2	67%	75.7	76.0	-0.3
3.	Artland Dragons	6	3	3	50%	80.8	78.2	+2.7
4.	Belgacom Liège Baske	6	1	5	17%	78.3	84.2	-5.8

2nd Round Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Pesaro	6	4	2	67%	84.5	80.5	+4.0
2.	Chalon/Saone	6	3	3	50%	82.2	80.0	+2.2
3.	APOEL Nicosia	6	3	3	50%	77.5	78.2	-0.7
4.	Budućnost Podgorica	6	2	4	33%	77.8	83.3	-5.5

2nd Round Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	6	4	2	67%	81.5	74.3	+7.2
2.	Antwerp Giants	6	3	3	50%	75.7	76.2	-0.5
3.	Bandırma	6	3	3	50%	77.2	80.2	-3.0
4.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	6	2	4	33%	80.8	84.5	-3.7

Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	6	4	2	67%	81.8	72.3	+9.5
2.	Budućnost Podgorica	6	4	2	67%	72.5	69.2	+3.3
3.	Gravelines Dunkerque	6	4	2	67%	70.2	70.0	+0.2
4.	Lokomotiv Kuban	6	0	6	0%	64.3	77.3	-13.0

Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	APOEL Nicosia	6	4	2	67%	82.5	76.0	+6.5
2.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	6	4	2	67%	80.3	79.0	+1.3
3.	Strasbourg	6	3	3	50%	84.0	83.2	+0.8
4.	BC Khimik	6	1	5	17%	82.7	91.3	-8.7

Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	6	5	1	83%	81.2	68.3	+12.8
2.	Pesaro	6	5	1	83%	78.3	66.2	+12.2
3.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	6	2	4	33%	69.5	81.2	-11.7
4.	Amsterdam	6	0	6	0%	59.8	73.2	-13.3

Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Chalon/Saone	6	4	2	67%	77.8	75.3	+2.5
2.	Mons-Hainaut	6	3	3	50%	75.3	75.7	-0.3
3.	Proteas EKA AEL	6	3	3	50%	77.7	78.8	-1.2
4.	Cedevita Junior	6	2	4	33%	80.3	81.3	-1.0

Group E

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Belgacom Liège Baske	6	5	1	83%	79.8	75.7	+4.2
2.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	6	3	3	50%	78.3	77.7	+0.7
3.	BC Donetsk	6	2	4	33%	83.7	86.0	-2.3
4.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	6	2	4	33%	78.3	80.8	-2.5

Group F

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Bandırma	6	5	1	83%	89.7	79.8	+9.8
2.	FMP Železnik	6	5	1	83%	87.2	81.3	+5.8
3.	VEF Rīga	6	2	4	33%	82.2	89.8	-7.7
4.	Generali Okapi Aalst	6	0	6	0%	79.0	87.0	-8.0

Group G

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Artland Dragons	6	5	1	83%	79.0	69.2	+9.8
2.	Antwerp Giants	6	3	3	50%	73.0	73.7	-0.7
3.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	6	3	3	50%	68.2	70.7	-2.5
4.	Tartu Rock	6	1	5	17%	68.3	75.0	-6.7

Group H

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	6	5	1	83%	84.5	73.8	+10.7
2.	KK Zagreb	6	3	3	50%	76.8	80.2	-3.3
3.	BC Kiev	6	2	4	33%	66.3	69.8	-3.5
4.	Keravnos Strovolos	6	2	4	33%	74.0	77.8	-3.8

2nd Round Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	3	3	0	100%	90.0	65.3	+24.7
2.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	3	3	0	100%	76.3	62.7	+13.7
3.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	3	2	1	67%	81.0	81.7	-0.7
4.	Proteas EKA AEL	3	1	2	33%	81.7	88.7	-7.0

2nd Round Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Artland Dragons	3	2	1	67%	79.3	74.0	+5.3
2.	FMP Železnik	3	2	1	67%	76.7	69.7	+7.0
3.	KK Zagreb	3	1	2	33%	75.3	81.3	-6.0
4.	Belgacom Liège Baske	3	0	3	0%	81.0	86.3	-5.3

2nd Round Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Pesaro	3	3	0	100%	85.3	76.3	+9.0
2.	Chalon/Saone	3	2	1	67%	86.3	77.0	+9.3
3.	Budućnost Podgorica	3	2	1	67%	85.0	80.7	+4.3
4.	APOEL Nicosia	3	2	1	67%	78.7	74.7	+4.0

2nd Round Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	3	3	0	100%	82.3	68.7	+13.7
2.	Bandırma	3	2	1	67%	89.7	85.3	+4.3
3.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	3	2	1	67%	80.3	76.3	+4.0
4.	Antwerp Giants	3	2	1	67%	74.3	73.3	+1.0

Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	3	2	1	67%	82.3	67.3	+15.0
2.	Budućnost Podgorica	3	2	1	67%	75.7	71.7	+4.0
3.	Gravelines Dunkerque	3	2	1	67%	70.3	66.3	+4.0
4.	Lokomotiv Kuban	3	0	3	0%	66.0	78.0	-12.0

Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	APOEL Nicosia	3	3	0	100%	90.0	73.3	+16.7
2.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	3	2	1	67%	83.3	77.3	+6.0
3.	Strasbourg	3	2	1	67%	81.0	78.0	+3.0
4.	BC Khimik	3	1	2	33%	88.0	88.0	0.0

Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	3	3	0	100%	82.3	59.0	+23.3
2.	Pesaro	3	3	0	100%	83.7	70.7	+13.0
3.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	3	1	2	33%	62.7	73.3	-10.7
4.	Amsterdam	3	0	3	0%	67.7	78.3	-10.7

Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Mons-Hainaut	3	3	0	100%	83.7	67.3	+16.3
2.	Chalon/Saone	3	3	0	100%	80.7	71.0	+9.7
3.	Proteas EKA AEL	3	3	0	100%	79.7	70.0	+9.7
4.	Cedevita Junior	3	2	1	67%	89.3	80.7	+8.7

Group E

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Belgacom Liège Baske	3	2	1	67%	77.7	74.3	+3.3
2.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	3	2	1	67%	81.3	79.3	+2.0
3.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	3	2	1	67%	81.3	79.7	+1.7
4.	BC Donetsk	3	1	2	33%	82.3	84.3	-2.0

Group F

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Bandırma	3	3	0	100%	97.0	80.3	+16.7
2.	FMP Železnik	3	3	0	100%	93.7	80.0	+13.7
3.	VEF Rīga	3	1	2	33%	79.3	82.0	-2.7
4.	Generali Okapi Aalst	3	0	3	0%	79.0	84.7	-5.7

Group G

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Artland Dragons	3	3	0	100%	81.0	64.0	+17.0
2.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	3	2	1	67%	73.3	74.3	-1.0
3.	Antwerp Giants	3	1	2	33%	68.3	69.3	-1.0
4.	Tartu Rock	3	1	2	33%	72.0	74.7	-2.7

Group H

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	3	3	0	100%	88.0	70.0	+18.0
2.	KK Zagreb	3	3	0	100%	81.3	73.7	+7.7
3.	BC Kiev	3	2	1	67%	71.7	66.3	+5.3
4.	Keravnos Strovolos	3	2	1	67%	78.3	74.0	+4.3

2nd Round Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	3	2	1	67%	85.7	79.7	+6.0
2.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	3	1	2	33%	77.3	80.7	-3.3
3.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	3	0	3	0%	67.0	84.3	-17.3
4.	Proteas EKA AEL	3	0	3	0%	68.3	84.3	-16.0

2nd Round Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	KK Zagreb	3	3	0	100%	76.0	70.7	+5.3
2.	FMP Železnik	3	2	1	67%	77.3	77.3	0.0
3.	Artland Dragons	3	1	2	33%	82.3	82.3	0.0
4.	Belgacom Liège Baske	3	1	2	33%	75.7	82.0	-6.3

2nd Round Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Pesaro	3	1	2	33%	83.7	84.7	-1.0
2.	Chalon/Saone	3	1	2	33%	78.0	83.0	-5.0
3.	APOEL Nicosia	3	1	2	33%	76.3	81.7	-5.3
4.	Budućnost Podgorica	3	0	3	0%	70.7	86.0	-15.3

2nd Round Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	3	1	2	33%	80.7	80.0	+0.7
2.	Antwerp Giants	3	1	2	33%	77.0	79.0	-2.0
3.	Bandırma	3	1	2	33%	64.7	75.0	-10.3
4.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	3	0	3	0%	81.3	92.7	-11.3

Group A

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	3	2	1	67%	81.3	77.3	+4.0
2.	Budućnost Podgorica	3	2	1	67%	69.3	66.7	+2.7
3.	Gravelines Dunkerque	3	2	1	67%	70.0	73.7	-3.7
4.	Lokomotiv Kuban	3	0	3	0%	62.7	76.7	-14.0

Group B

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	3	2	1	67%	77.3	80.7	-3.3
2.	Strasbourg	3	1	2	33%	87.0	88.3	-1.3
3.	APOEL Nicosia	3	1	2	33%	75.0	78.7	-3.7
4.	BC Khimik	3	0	3	0%	77.3	94.7	-17.3

Group C

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Pesaro	3	2	1	67%	73.0	61.7	+11.3
2.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	3	2	1	67%	80.0	77.7	+2.3
3.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	3	1	2	33%	76.3	89.0	-12.7
4.	Amsterdam	3	0	3	0%	52.0	68.0	-16.0

Group D

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Chalon/Saone	3	1	2	33%	75.0	79.7	-4.7
2.	Cedevita Junior	3	0	3	0%	71.3	82.0	-10.7
3.	Proteas EKA AEL	3	0	3	0%	75.7	87.7	-12.0
4.	Mons-Hainaut	3	0	3	0%	67.0	84.0	-17.0

Group E

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Belgacom Liège Baske	3	3	0	100%	82.0	77.0	+5.0
2.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	3	1	2	33%	75.3	76.0	-0.7
3.	BC Donetsk	3	1	2	33%	85.0	87.7	-2.7
4.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	3	0	3	0%	75.3	82.0	-6.7

Group F

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Bandırma	3	2	1	67%	82.3	79.3	+3.0
2.	FMP Železnik	3	2	1	67%	80.7	82.7	-2.0
3.	VEF Rīga	3	1	2	33%	85.0	97.7	-12.7
4.	Generali Okapi Aalst	3	0	3	0%	79.0	89.3	-10.3

Group G

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Artland Dragons	3	2	1	67%	77.0	74.3	+2.7
2.	Antwerp Giants	3	2	1	67%	77.7	78.0	-0.3
3.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	3	1	2	33%	63.0	67.0	-4.0
4.	Tartu Rock	3	0	3	0%	64.7	75.3	-10.7

Group H

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	3	2	1	67%	81.0	77.7	+3.3
2.	Keravnos Strovolos	3	0	3	0%	69.7	81.7	-12.0
3.	BC Kiev	3	0	3	0%	61.0	73.3	-12.3
4.	KK Zagreb	3	0	3	0%	72.3	86.7	-14.3

Naciśnij na wybranej kolumnie w celu posortowania danych
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Wybierz Sezon

2014-2015
2013-2014
2012-2013
2011-2012
2010-2011
2009-2010
2008-2009

Official Site

Wikipedia

Niedziela 2. maj 2010

EuroChallenge - Playoffs - Finals		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Krasnye Krylya Samara	75 - 83	BG Göttingen	3.20	1.30
EuroChallenge - Playoffs - Bronze		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Pesaro	80 - 86	Roanne	1.50	2.40

Piątek 30. kwiecień 2010

EuroChallenge - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
BG Göttingen	77 - 67	Roanne	1.45	2.55
Krasnye Krylya Samara	73 - 70	Pesaro	1.85	1.85

Czwartek 25. marzec 2010

EuroChallenge - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Antwerp Giants	63 - 78	Pesaro	2.20	1.60
APOEL Nicosia	78 - 84	Roanne	2.00	1.71
FMP Železnik	71 - 76	BG Göttingen	1.55	2.30
Krasnye Krylya Samara	79 - 78	KK Zagreb

Wtorek 23. marzec 2010

BG Göttingen	75 - 69	FMP Železnik	1.15	4.75
KK Zagreb	77 - 81	Krasnye Krylya Samara
Pesaro	92 - 76	Antwerp Giants	1.12	5.35
Roanne	89 - 67	APOEL Nicosia	1.15	4.75

Wtorek 9. marzec 2010

EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group A		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
EiffelTowers Den Bosch	67 - 86	BG Göttingen
Proteas EKA AEL	68 - 84	Krasnye Krylya Samara
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group B		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
FMP Železnik	81 - 55	Belgacom Liège Basket
KK Zagreb	69 - 67	Artland Dragons	1.50	2.45
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group C		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
APOEL Nicosia	81 - 76	Budućnost Podgorica	1.45	2.55
Chalon/Saone	94 - 88	Pesaro	1.40	2.75
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group D		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Bandırma	94 - 85	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	1.65	2.10
Roanne	68 - 66	Antwerp Giants	1.15	4.75

Wtorek 2. marzec 2010

EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group A		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
BG Göttingen	89 - 68	Krasnye Krylya Samara
EiffelTowers Den Bosch	91 - 79	Proteas EKA AEL
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group B		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Belgacom Liège Basket	92 - 100	Artland Dragons
FMP Železnik	63 - 74	KK Zagreb	1.40	2.75
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group C		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
APOEL Nicosia	85 - 72	Chalon/Saone	1.50	2.45
Budućnost Podgorica	90 - 87	Pesaro	1.60	2.20
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group D		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Bandırma	95 - 83	Roanne	1.55	2.30
Enisey Krasnoyarsk	89 - 77	Antwerp Giants

Wtorek 23. luty 2010

EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group A		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Krasnye Krylya Samara	77 - 47	EiffelTowers Den Bosch
Proteas EKA AEL	90 - 97	BG Göttingen	1.70	2.00
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group B		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Artland Dragons	82 - 72	FMP Železnik	1.40	2.75
KK Zagreb	79 - 94	Belgacom Liège Basket
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group C		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Chalon/Saone	87 - 59	Budućnost Podgorica	1.45	2.55
Pesaro	78 - 69	APOEL Nicosia	1.12	5.35
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group D		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Antwerp Giants	72 - 59	Bandırma	1.65	2.10
Roanne	103 - 87	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	1.25	3.55

Wtorek 9. luty 2010

EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group A		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
BG Göttingen	89 - 69	EiffelTowers Den Bosch	1.20	4.05
Krasnye Krylya Samara	70 - 67	Proteas EKA AEL
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group B		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Artland Dragons	70 - 72 AET	KK Zagreb	1.40	2.75
Belgacom Liège Basket	72 - 77	FMP Železnik
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group C		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Budućnost Podgorica	89 - 76	APOEL Nicosia	1.25	3.55
Pesaro	88 - 83	Chalon/Saone	1.20	4.05
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group D		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Antwerp Giants	70 - 89	Roanne	1.70	2.00
Enisey Krasnoyarsk	77 - 82	Bandırma	1.25	3.55

Wtorek 2. luty 2010

EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group A		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Krasnye Krylya Samara	82 - 74 AET	BG Göttingen
Proteas EKA AEL	87 - 85 AET	EiffelTowers Den Bosch
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group B		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Artland Dragons	86 - 78	Belgacom Liège Basket
KK Zagreb	78 - 83	FMP Železnik	1.20	4.05
EuroChallenge - 2nd Round Group C		2009-2010	Kursy 1x2
Chalon/Saone	78 - 84	APOEL Nicosia	1.20	4.05
Pesaro	90 - 77	Budućnost Podgorica	1.25	3.55

Więcej Wyników

maj 2010
kwiecień 2010
marzec 2010
luty 2010
styczeń 2010
grudzień 2009
listopad 2009

APOEL Nicosia
Amsterdam
Antwerp Giants
Artland Dragons
BC Donetsk
BC Khimik
BC Kiev
BC Tsmoki-Minsk
BG Göttingen
Bandırma
Belgacom Liège Bas
Budućnost Podgoric
CSU Asesoft Ploies
Cedevita Junior
Chalon/Saone
EiffelTowers Den B
Enisey Krasnoyarsk
FMP Železnik
Generali Okapi Aal
Gravelines Dunkerq
KK Zagreb
Keravnos Strovolos
Krasnye Krylya Sam
Lokomotiv Kuban
Mons-Hainaut
Pesaro
Proteas EKA AEL
Roanne
Strasbourg
Tartu Rock
VEF Rīga
WBC Raiffeisen Wel

Wybierz Sezon

2014-2015
2013-2014
2012-2013
2011-2012
2010-2011
2009-2010
2008-2009

Official Site

Wikipedia

Ostatnie 6 Spotkania
Liczba gier u siebie
Liczba gier na wyjeździe

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	6	6	0	100%	81.0	69.5	+11.5
2.	Roanne	6	4	2	67%	79.5	77.2	+2.3
3.	Gravelines Dunkerque	6	4	2	67%	70.2	70.0	+0.2
4.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	6	4	2	67%	76.7	77.5	-0.8
5.	Artland Dragons	6	3	3	50%	80.8	78.2	+2.7
6.	Chalon/Saone	6	3	3	50%	82.2	80.0	+2.2
7.	Strasbourg	6	3	3	50%	84.0	83.2	+0.8
8.	Mons-Hainaut	6	3	3	50%	75.3	75.7	-0.3
9.	KK Zagreb	6	3	3	50%	74.8	75.7	-0.8
10.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	6	3	3	50%	68.2	70.7	-2.5
11.	Bandırma	6	3	3	50%	77.2	80.2	-3.0
12.	Pesaro	6	2	4	33%	82.5	80.3	+2.2
13.	FMP Železnik	6	2	4	33%	72.2	72.3	-0.2
14.	Cedevita Junior	6	2	4	33%	80.3	81.3	-1.0
15.	BC Donetsk	6	2	4	33%	83.7	86.0	-2.3
16.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	6	2	4	33%	78.3	80.8	-2.5
17.	BC Kiev	6	2	4	33%	66.3	69.8	-3.5
18.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	6	2	4	33%	80.8	84.5	-3.7
19.	Keravnos Strovolos	6	2	4	33%	74.0	77.8	-3.8
20.	APOEL Nicosia	6	2	4	33%	76.0	81.3	-5.3
21.	Budućnost Podgorica	6	2	4	33%	77.8	83.3	-5.5
22.	VEF Rīga	6	2	4	33%	82.2	89.8	-7.7
23.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	6	2	4	33%	74.0	83.0	-9.0
24.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	6	2	4	33%	69.5	81.2	-11.7
25.	Belgacom Liège Baske	6	1	5	17%	78.3	84.2	-5.8
26.	Tartu Rock	6	1	5	17%	68.3	75.0	-6.7
27.	Antwerp Giants	6	1	5	17%	70.7	79.2	-8.5
28.	BC Khimik	6	1	5	17%	82.7	91.3	-8.7
29.	Proteas EKA AEL	6	1	5	17%	75.0	86.5	-11.5
30.	Generali Okapi Aalst	6	0	6	0%	79.0	87.0	-8.0
31.	Lokomotiv Kuban	6	0	6	0%	64.3	77.3	-13.0
32.	Amsterdam	6	0	6	0%	59.8	73.2	-13.3

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	Roanne	6	6	0	100%	87.8	68.8	+19.0
2.	BG Göttingen	6	5	1	83%	82.7	68.7	+14.0
3.	Artland Dragons	6	5	1	83%	80.2	69.0	+11.2
4.	Bandırma	6	5	1	83%	93.3	82.8	+10.5
5.	Chalon/Saone	6	5	1	83%	83.5	74.0	+9.5
6.	Pesaro	6	5	1	83%	86.7	79.5	+7.2
7.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	6	5	1	83%	76.0	69.8	+6.2
8.	FMP Železnik	6	4	2	67%	83.3	75.2	+8.2
9.	Budućnost Podgorica	6	4	2	67%	80.3	76.2	+4.2
10.	APOEL Nicosia	6	4	2	67%	80.0	76.2	+3.8
11.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	6	4	2	67%	80.8	77.8	+3.0
12.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	6	4	2	67%	82.2	79.5	+2.7
13.	Proteas EKA AEL	6	4	2	67%	80.7	79.3	+1.3
14.	Mons-Hainaut	3	3	0	100%	83.7	67.3	+16.3
15.	KK Zagreb	6	3	3	50%	78.0	78.8	-0.8
16.	Antwerp Giants	6	3	3	50%	69.7	71.5	-1.8
17.	Cedevita Junior	3	2	1	67%	89.3	80.7	+8.7
18.	BC Kiev	3	2	1	67%	71.7	66.3	+5.3
19.	Keravnos Strovolos	3	2	1	67%	78.3	74.0	+4.3
20.	Gravelines Dunkerque	3	2	1	67%	70.3	66.3	+4.0
21.	Strasbourg	3	2	1	67%	81.0	78.0	+3.0
22.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	3	2	1	67%	81.3	79.7	+1.7
23.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	3	2	1	67%	73.3	74.3	-1.0
24.	Belgacom Liège Baske	6	2	4	33%	79.3	80.3	-1.0
25.	BC Khimik	3	1	2	33%	88.0	88.0	0.0
26.	BC Donetsk	3	1	2	33%	82.3	84.3	-2.0
27.	VEF Rīga	3	1	2	33%	79.3	82.0	-2.7
28.	Tartu Rock	3	1	2	33%	72.0	74.7	-2.7
29.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	3	1	2	33%	62.7	73.3	-10.7
30.	Generali Okapi Aalst	3	0	3	0%	79.0	84.7	-5.7
31.	Amsterdam	3	0	3	0%	67.7	78.3	-10.7
32.	Lokomotiv Kuban	3	0	3	0%	66.0	78.0	-12.0

#	Drużyna	SR	W	P	W%	ØPF	ØPA	ØDiff
1.	BG Göttingen	6	5	1	83%	81.3	74.8	+6.5
2.	Belgacom Liège Baske	6	4	2	67%	78.8	79.5	-0.7
3.	Pesaro	6	3	3	50%	80.0	76.0	+4.0
4.	Artland Dragons	6	3	3	50%	79.7	78.3	+1.3
5.	Roanne	6	3	3	50%	79.8	79.2	+0.7
6.	Krasnye Krylya Samar	6	3	3	50%	79.2	80.5	-1.3
7.	FMP Železnik	6	3	3	50%	77.3	79.5	-2.2
8.	KK Zagreb	6	3	3	50%	75.5	78.0	-2.5
9.	Bandırma	6	3	3	50%	73.5	77.2	-3.7
10.	Gravelines Dunkerque	3	2	1	67%	70.0	73.7	-3.7
11.	Chalon/Saone	6	2	4	33%	76.5	81.3	-4.8
12.	Antwerp Giants	6	2	4	33%	75.0	80.2	-5.2
13.	Budućnost Podgorica	6	2	4	33%	70.0	76.3	-6.3
14.	APOEL Nicosia	6	2	4	33%	75.7	82.3	-6.7
15.	EiffelTowers Den Bos	6	2	4	33%	72.2	82.5	-10.3
16.	Strasbourg	3	1	2	33%	87.0	88.3	-1.3
17.	BC Donetsk	3	1	2	33%	85.0	87.7	-2.7
18.	WBC Raiffeisen Wels	3	1	2	33%	63.0	67.0	-4.0
19.	Enisey Krasnoyarsk	6	1	5	17%	78.3	84.3	-6.0
20.	VEF Rīga	3	1	2	33%	85.0	97.7	-12.7
21.	BC Tsmoki-Minsk	3	1	2	33%	76.3	89.0	-12.7
22.	CSU Asesoft Ploiesti	3	0	3	0%	75.3	82.0	-6.7
23.	Generali Okapi Aalst	3	0	3	0%	79.0	89.3	-10.3
24.	Cedevita Junior	3	0	3	0%	71.3	82.0	-10.7
25.	Tartu Rock	3	0	3	0%	64.7	75.3	-10.7
26.	Keravnos Strovolos	3	0	3	0%	69.7	81.7	-12.0
27.	BC Kiev	3	0	3	0%	61.0	73.3	-12.3
28.	Lokomotiv Kuban	3	0	3	0%	62.7	76.7	-14.0
29.	Amsterdam	3	0	3	0%	52.0	68.0	-16.0
30.	Mons-Hainaut	3	0	3	0%	67.0	84.0	-17.0
31.	BC Khimik	3	0	3	0%	77.3	94.7	-17.3
32.	Proteas EKA AEL	6	0	6	0%	72.0	86.0	-14.0

Sezon		Gier	1	x	2	¦	1	2	¦	Ponad 160.5	Poniżej 160.5	Ponad 150.5	Poniżej 150.5	Home Advantage
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	66.7%	8.3%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	58.3%	41.7%	50.0%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	41.7%	58.3%	16.7%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	41.7%	8.3%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	75.0%	25.0%	0.0%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	66.7%	33.3%	16.7%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	16.7%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	33.3%	16.7%	50.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	58.3%	41.7%	-16.7%
2014-2015	Playoffy	14	71.4%	0.0%	28.6%	¦	71.4%	28.6%	¦	35.7%	64.3%	42.9%	57.1%	42.9%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	66.7%	8.3%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	83.3%	0.0%	16.7%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	58.3%	41.7%	66.7%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	41.7%	33.3%	25.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	-16.7%
2014-2015	Group Stage	12	41.7%	0.0%	58.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	75.0%	25.0%	-16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	0.0%	100.0%	25.0%	75.0%	33.3%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	50.0%	50.0%	16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	33.3%	66.7%	16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	16.7%	25.0%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	66.7%	33.3%	33.3%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	41.7%	8.3%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	41.7%	58.3%	0.0%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	8.3%	91.7%	41.7%	58.3%	16.7%
2013-2014	Playoffy	13	46.2%	7.7%	46.2%	¦	46.2%	53.8%	¦	23.1%	76.9%	38.5%	61.5%	-7.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	8.3%	91.7%	25.0%	75.0%	16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	58.3%	41.7%	0.0%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	66.7%	33.3%	16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	75.0%	16.7%	8.3%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	58.3%	41.7%	50.0%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	0.0%	100.0%	25.0%	75.0%	16.7%
2013-2014	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	75.0%	25.0%	16.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	33.3%	66.7%	16.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	58.3%	41.7%	33.3%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	33.3%	66.7%	50.0%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	75.0%	8.3%	16.7%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	58.3%	41.7%	66.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	41.7%	16.7%	41.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	100.0%	0.0%	-16.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	75.0%	25.0%	0.0%
2012-2013	Playoffy	14	57.1%	14.3%	28.6%	¦	57.1%	42.9%	¦	21.4%	78.6%	57.1%	42.9%	14.3%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	8.3%	91.7%	50.0%	50.0%	0.0%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	75.0%	25.0%	16.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	91.7%	0.0%	8.3%	¦	91.7%	8.3%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	66.7%	33.3%	83.3%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	50.0%	16.7%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	66.7%	33.3%	16.7%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	50.0%	50.0%	33.3%
2012-2013	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	58.3%	41.7%	0.0%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	75.0%	25.0%	16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	58.3%	41.7%	16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	75.0%	25.0%	33.3%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	8.3%	91.7%	41.7%	58.3%	50.0%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	41.7%	0.0%	58.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	66.7%	33.3%	-16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	58.3%	41.7%	16.7%
2011-2012	Playoffy	14	42.9%	0.0%	57.1%	¦	42.9%	57.1%	¦	14.3%	85.7%	50.0%	50.0%	-14.3%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	41.7%	0.0%	58.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	-16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	41.7%	0.0%	58.3%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	83.3%	16.7%	-16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	58.3%	16.7%	25.0%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	33.3%	66.7%	33.3%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	75.0%	25.0%	100.0%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	50.0%	50.0%	16.7%
2011-2012	Group Stage	12	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	66.7%	33.3%	33.3%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	58.3%	41.7%	50.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	50.0%	50.0%	0.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	66.7%	16.7%	16.7%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	58.3%	41.7%	66.7%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	41.7%	58.3%	16.7%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	41.7%	58.3%	16.7%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	83.3%	8.3%	8.3%	¦	91.7%	8.3%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	41.7%	58.3%	83.3%
2010-2011	Playoffy	14	42.9%	21.4%	35.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	21.4%	78.6%	57.1%	42.9%	0.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	91.7%	0.0%	8.3%	¦	91.7%	8.3%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	50.0%	50.0%	83.3%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	41.7%	58.3%	50.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	66.7%	33.3%	0.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	66.7%	33.3%	0.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	58.3%	41.7%	50.0%
2010-2011	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	66.7%	33.3%	50.0%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	41.7%	58.3%	0.0%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	58.3%	8.3%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	75.0%	25.0%	33.3%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	25.0%	75.0%	16.7%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	91.7%	0.0%	8.3%	¦	91.7%	8.3%	¦	16.7%	83.3%	75.0%	25.0%	83.3%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	16.7%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	58.3%	0.0%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	100.0%	0.0%	16.7%
2009-2010	Playoffy	12	50.0%	0.0%	50.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	58.3%	41.7%	0.0%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	50.0%	8.3%	41.7%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	33.3%	66.7%	16.7%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	83.3%	0.0%	16.7%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	58.3%	41.7%	66.7%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	58.3%	16.7%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	83.3%	16.7%	50.0%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	41.7%	8.3%	50.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	58.3%	41.7%	-16.7%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
2009-2010	Group Stage	12	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	66.7%	33.3%	50.0%
2008-2009	Playoffy	14	64.3%	7.1%	28.6%	¦	64.3%	35.7%	¦	28.6%	71.4%	78.6%	21.4%	28.6%

Naciśnij na wybranej kolumnie w celu posortowania danych
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Statystyki Bramkowe & Goal difference