# |
Команда |
І |
В |
Н |
П |
ЗГ |
ПГ |
Різн. |
О |
О/І |
В% |
ØЗГ |
ØПГ |
1. | Liaoning Whowin |
24 |
18 |
3 |
3 |
49 |
17 |
+32 |
57 |
2.38 |
75% |
2.04 |
0.71 |
2. | Shanghai Shenxin |
24 |
14 |
5 |
5 |
48 |
22 |
+26 |
47 |
1.96 |
58% |
2.00 |
0.92 |
3. | Shanghai Port |
24 |
13 |
5 |
6 |
43 |
25 |
+18 |
44 |
1.83 |
54% |
1.79 |
1.04 |
4. | Shenyang Dongjin |
24 |
12 |
8 |
4 |
39 |
21 |
+18 |
44 |
1.83 |
50% |
1.62 |
0.88 |
5. | Guangdong Sunray Cav |
24 |
10 |
5 |
9 |
37 |
37 |
0 |
35 |
1.46 |
42% |
1.54 |
1.54 |
6. | Yanbian Fude |
24 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
29 |
1.21 |
29% |
1.21 |
1.25 |
7. | Anhui Jiufang |
24 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
35 |
44 |
-9 |
29 |
1.21 |
29% |
1.46 |
1.83 |
8. | Beijing 361º |
24 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
29 |
33 |
-4 |
28 |
1.17 |
29% |
1.21 |
1.38 |
9. | Shanghai Zobon |
24 |
7 |
6 |
11 |
23 |
35 |
-12 |
27 |
1.12 |
29% |
0.96 |
1.46 |
10. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
24 |
7 |
5 |
12 |
38 |
45 |
-7 |
26 |
1.08 |
29% |
1.58 |
1.88 |
11. | Nanjing Yoyo |
24 |
5 |
9 |
10 |
23 |
40 |
-17 |
24 |
1.00 |
21% |
0.96 |
1.67 |
12. | Beijing Hongdeng |
24 |
5 |
7 |
12 |
26 |
36 |
-10 |
22 |
0.92 |
21% |
1.08 |
1.50 |
13. | Shenzhen Peng City |
24 |
4 |
4 |
16 |
26 |
60 |
-34 |
16 |
0.67 |
17% |
1.08 |
2.50 |
# |
Команда |
І |
В |
Н |
П |
ЗГ |
ПГ |
Різн. |
О |
О/І |
В% |
ØЗГ |
ØПГ |
1. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
36 |
7 |
+29 |
31 |
2.58 |
83% |
3.00 |
0.58 |
2. | Guangdong Sunray Cav |
12 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
27 |
10 |
+17 |
31 |
2.58 |
83% |
2.25 |
0.83 |
3. | Liaoning Whowin |
12 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
29 |
7 |
+22 |
29 |
2.42 |
75% |
2.42 |
0.58 |
4. | Shanghai Port |
11 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
24 |
7 |
+17 |
26 |
2.36 |
73% |
2.18 |
0.64 |
5. | Shenyang Dongjin |
12 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
24 |
8 |
+16 |
25 |
2.08 |
58% |
2.00 |
0.67 |
6. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
19 |
12 |
+7 |
22 |
1.83 |
50% |
1.58 |
1.00 |
7. | Anhui Jiufang |
12 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
25 |
19 |
+6 |
22 |
1.83 |
50% |
2.08 |
1.58 |
8. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
11 |
+7 |
21 |
1.75 |
50% |
1.50 |
0.92 |
9. | Yanbian Fude |
12 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
19 |
9 |
+10 |
20 |
1.67 |
42% |
1.58 |
0.75 |
10. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
12 |
9 |
+3 |
20 |
1.67 |
42% |
1.00 |
0.75 |
11. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
13 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
27 |
26 |
+1 |
19 |
1.46 |
46% |
2.08 |
2.00 |
12. | Beijing Hongdeng |
12 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
13 |
+2 |
13 |
1.08 |
25% |
1.25 |
1.08 |
13. | Shenzhen Peng City |
12 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
18 |
-4 |
13 |
1.08 |
25% |
1.17 |
1.50 |
# |
Команда |
І |
В |
Н |
П |
ЗГ |
ПГ |
Різн. |
О |
О/І |
В% |
ØЗГ |
ØПГ |
1. | Liaoning Whowin |
12 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
10 |
+10 |
28 |
2.33 |
75% |
1.67 |
0.83 |
2. | Shenyang Dongjin |
12 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
15 |
13 |
+2 |
19 |
1.58 |
42% |
1.25 |
1.08 |
3. | Shanghai Port |
13 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
19 |
18 |
+1 |
18 |
1.38 |
38% |
1.46 |
1.38 |
4. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
12 |
15 |
-3 |
16 |
1.33 |
33% |
1.00 |
1.25 |
5. | Yanbian Fude |
12 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
21 |
-11 |
9 |
0.75 |
17% |
0.83 |
1.75 |
6. | Beijing Hongdeng |
12 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
11 |
23 |
-12 |
9 |
0.75 |
17% |
0.92 |
1.92 |
7. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
11 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
11 |
19 |
-8 |
7 |
0.64 |
9% |
1.00 |
1.73 |
8. | Anhui Jiufang |
12 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
25 |
-15 |
7 |
0.58 |
8% |
0.83 |
2.08 |
9. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
21 |
-11 |
6 |
0.50 |
8% |
0.83 |
1.75 |
10. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
24 |
-19 |
6 |
0.50 |
8% |
0.42 |
2.00 |
11. | Guangdong Sunray Cav |
12 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
10 |
27 |
-17 |
4 |
0.33 |
0% |
0.83 |
2.25 |
12. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
11 |
31 |
-20 |
4 |
0.33 |
0% |
0.92 |
2.58 |
13. | Shenzhen Peng City |
12 |
1 |
0 |
11 |
12 |
42 |
-30 |
3 |
0.25 |
8% |
1.00 |
3.50 |
Для сортування таблиці натисніть на заголовок стовпця Наведіть курсор на відсотки, щоб побачити коефіцієнти | Вибрати сезон
Офіційний сайт
Wikipedia
|