AnnaBet.com
Vitajte hosť   Prihlásiť   Registrovať sa Prosím zaregistrujte sa alebo prihláste
Online obchod    Facebook   Twitter   Skontaktujte nás

Futbal

Anglicko
Taliansko
Španielsko
Nemecko
Francúzsko
Holandsko
Belgicko
Portugalsko
Škótsko
Rusko
Medzinárodné
Albánsko
Alžírsko
Argentína
Arménsko
Austrália
Azerbajdžan
Bahrajn Bielorusko
Bolívia
Bosna a Hercegovina
Brazília
Bulharsko
Česko
Chorvátsko
Čierna Hora
Čile
Čína
Cyprus
Dánsko
Egypt
Ekvádor Estónsko
Faerské ostrovy
Fínsko
Grécko
Gruzínsko
Guatemala Honduras Hongkong
India
Indonézia
Irak Irán
Írsko
Island
Izrael
JAR
Jamajka Japonsko
Jordánsko
Južná Kórea
Kanada
Katar
Kazachstan
Keňa
Kolumbia
Kostarika
Kuvajt
Litva
Lotyšsko
Luxembursko
Maďarsko
Malajzia Malta
Maroko Mexiko
Moldavsko
Nikaragua Nórsko
North Ireland
North Macedonia
Nový Zéland Paraguaj
Peru
Poľsko
Rakúsko
Rumunsko
Salvádor San Maríno
Saudská Arábia
Singapur
Slovensko
Slovinsko
Srbsko
Švajčiarsko
Švédsko
Sýria
Tadžikistan
Taiwan Tanzánia Thajsko
Tunisko
Turecko
Turkménsko USA
Uganda Ukrajina
United Arab Emirates
Uruguaj
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam
Wales

  Olympijské hry 1992 @ Španielsko

Group A

# Tím Z V R P SG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØSG ØOG
1. Poľsko 3 2 1 0 7 2 +5 5 1.67 67% 2.33 0.67
2. Taliansko 3 2 0 1 3 4 -1 4 1.33 67% 1.00 1.33
3. USA 3 1 1 1 6 5 +1 3 1.00 33% 2.00 1.67
4. Kuvajt 3 0 0 3 1 6 -5 0 0.00 0% 0.33 2.00

Group B
# Tím Z V R P SG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØSG ØOG
1. Španielsko 3 3 0 0 8 0 +8 6 2.00 100% 2.67 0.00
2. Katar 3 1 1 1 2 3 -1 3 1.00 33% 0.67 1.00
3. Egypt 3 1 0 2 4 6 -2 2 0.67 33% 1.33 2.00
4. Kolumbia 3 0 1 2 4 9 -5 1 0.33 0% 1.33 3.00

Group C
# Tím Z V R P SG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØSG ØOG
1. Švédsko 3 1 2 0 5 1 +4 4 1.33 33% 1.67 0.33
2. Paraguaj 3 1 2 0 3 1 +2 4 1.33 33% 1.00 0.33
3. Južná Kórea 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1.00 0% 0.67 0.67
4. Maroko 3 0 1 2 2 8 -6 1 0.33 0% 0.67 2.67

Group D
# Tím Z V R P SG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØSG ØOG
1. Ghana 3 1 2 0 4 2 +2 4 1.33 33% 1.33 0.67
2. Austrália 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 3 1.00 33% 1.67 1.33
3. Mexiko 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 1.00 0% 1.00 1.00
4. Dánsko 3 0 2 1 1 4 -3 2 0.67 0% 0.33 1.33


Kliknite na hocijaký stĺpec, aby ste zoradili tabuľku
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Vybrať sezónu

2024
2020
2016
2012
2008
2004
2000
1996
1992
1988
1984
1980
1976
1972
1968
1964
1960
1956
1952
1948
1936
1928
1924
1920
1912
1908
1904
1900

Oficiálna stránka

Wikipedia

Sobota 8. august 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Playoffs - Finals1992 Kurzy 1x2
Poľsko    2 - 3    Španielsko
   
Piatok 7. august 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Playoffs - Bronze1992 Kurzy 1x2
Austrália    0 - 1    Ghana
   
Streda 5. august 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals1992 Kurzy 1x2
Poľsko    6 - 1    Austrália
Španielsko    2 - 0    Ghana
   
Nedeľa 2. august 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals1992 Kurzy 1x2
Ghana    4 - 2 pp Paraguaj
Švédsko    1 - 2    Austrália
   
Sobota 1. august 1992
   
Poľsko    2 - 0    Katar
Španielsko    1 - 0    Taliansko
   
Štvrtok 30. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group C1992 Kurzy 1x2
Paraguaj    3 - 1    Maroko
Švédsko    1 - 1    Južná Kórea
Olympijské hry - Group D1992 Kurzy 1x2
Dánsko    0 - 3    Austrália
Mexiko    1 - 1    Ghana
   
Streda 29. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group A1992 Kurzy 1x2
Taliansko    1 - 0    Kuvajt
USA    2 - 2    Poľsko
Olympijské hry - Group B1992 Kurzy 1x2
Kolumbia    3 - 4    Egypt
Španielsko    2 - 0    Katar
   
Utorok 28. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group C1992 Kurzy 1x2
Paraguaj    0 - 0    Južná Kórea
Švédsko    4 - 0    Maroko
Olympijské hry - Group D1992 Kurzy 1x2
Dánsko    0 - 0    Ghana
Mexiko    1 - 1    Austrália
   
Pondelok 27. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group A1992 Kurzy 1x2
Taliansko    0 - 3    Poľsko
USA    3 - 1    Kuvajt
Olympijské hry - Group B1992 Kurzy 1x2
Kolumbia    1 - 1    Katar
Španielsko    2 - 0    Egypt
   
Nedeľa 26. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group C1992 Kurzy 1x2
Maroko    1 - 1    Južná Kórea
Švédsko    0 - 0    Paraguaj
Olympijské hry - Group D1992 Kurzy 1x2
Dánsko    1 - 1    Mexiko
Ghana    3 - 1    Austrália
   
Piatok 24. júl 1992
   
Olympijské hry - Group A1992 Kurzy 1x2
Taliansko    2 - 1    USA
Poľsko    2 - 0    Kuvajt
Olympijské hry - Group B1992 Kurzy 1x2
Egypt    0 - 1    Katar
Španielsko    4 - 0    Kolumbia

Viac výsledkov

august 1992
júl 1992

Austrália
Dánsko
Egypt
Ghana
Južná Kórea
Katar
Kolumbia
Kuvajt
Maroko
Mexiko
Paraguaj
Poľsko
Španielsko
Švédsko
Taliansko
USA

Vybrať sezónu

2024
2020
2016
2012
2008
2004
2000
1996
1992
1988
1984
1980
1976
1972
1968
1964
1960
1956
1952
1948
1936
1928
1924
1920
1912
1908
1904
1900

Oficiálna stránka

Wikipedia

# Tím Z V R P SG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØSG ØOG
1. Španielsko 6 6 0 0 14 2 +12 0 0.00 100% 2.33 0.33
2. Poľsko 6 4 1 1 17 6 +11 0 0.00 67% 2.83 1.00
3. Ghana 6 2 2 1 9 6 +3 0 0.00 50% 1.17 1.00
4. Švédsko 4 1 2 1 6 3 +3 0 0.00 25% 1.50 0.75
5. USA 3 1 1 1 6 5 +1 0 0.00 33% 2.00 1.67
6. Paraguaj 4 1 2 0 5 5 0 0 0.00 25% 1.25 0.75
7. Mexiko 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0.00 0% 1.00 1.00
8. Južná Kórea 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 0 0.00 0% 0.67 0.67
9. Egypt 3 1 0 2 4 6 -2 0 0.00 33% 1.33 2.00
10. Taliansko 4 2 0 2 3 5 -2 0 0.00 50% 0.75 1.25
11. Katar 4 1 1 2 2 5 -3 0 0.00 25% 0.50 1.25
12. Dánsko 3 0 2 1 1 4 -3 0 0.00 0% 0.33 1.33
13. Austrália 6 2 1 3 8 12 -4 0 0.00 33% 1.33 2.00
14. Kolumbia 3 0 1 2 4 9 -5 0 0.00 0% 1.33 3.00
15. Kuvajt 3 0 0 3 1 6 -5 0 0.00 0% 0.33 2.00
16. Maroko 3 0 1 2 2 8 -6 0 0.00 0% 0.67 2.67

-
Sezóna Zápasov 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Viac ako 2.5 Menej ako 2.5 Viac ako 1.5 Menej ako 1.5 Výhoda domácich
2024Skupinová fáza24 41.7% 12.5% 45.8%  ¦  47.6% 52.4%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 75.0% 25.0% -4.8%
2024Playoff8 25.0% 37.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
2020Skupinová fáza24 33.3% 20.8% 45.8%  ¦  42.1% 57.9%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 33.3% -15.8%
2020Playoff8 25.0% 62.5% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 50.0% 50.0% 25.0%
2016Skupinová fáza31 38.7% 41.9% 19.4%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  51.6% 48.4% 71.0% 29.0% 33.3%
2016Playoff8 37.5% 12.5% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
2012Skupinová fáza24 50.0% 37.5% 12.5%  ¦  80.0% 20.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 58.3% 41.7% 60.0%
2012Playoff8 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 100.0% 0.0% 25.0%
2008Skupinová fáza24 45.8% 25.0% 29.2%  ¦  61.1% 38.9%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 58.3% 41.7% 22.2%
2008Playoff8 37.5% 25.0% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 25.0%
2004Skupinová fáza24 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 75.0% 25.0% 11.1%
2004Playoff8 62.5% 12.5% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 25.0%
2000Skupinová fáza24 37.5% 20.8% 41.7%  ¦  47.4% 52.6%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% -5.3%
2000Playoff8 25.0% 37.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% -25.0%
1996Skupinová fáza24 70.8% 25.0% 4.2%  ¦  94.4% 5.6%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 70.8% 29.2% 88.9%
1996Playoff8 62.5% 25.0% 12.5%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 100.0% 0.0% 75.0%
1992Skupinová fáza24 41.7% 41.7% 16.7%  ¦  71.4% 28.6%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 79.2% 20.8% 42.9%
1992Playoff8 50.0% 12.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 25.0%
1988Skupinová fáza24 70.8% 25.0% 4.2%  ¦  94.4% 5.6%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 79.2% 20.8% 88.9%
1988Playoff8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 87.5% 12.5% 50.0%
1984Skupinová fáza24 50.0% 20.8% 29.2%  ¦  63.2% 36.8%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 26.3%
1984Playoff8 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 87.5% 12.5% 75.0%
1980Skupinová fáza24 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
1980Playoff8 87.5% 0.0% 12.5%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 75.0%
1976Skupinová fáza15 53.3% 40.0% 6.7%  ¦  88.9% 11.1%  ¦  53.3% 46.7% 66.7% 33.3% 77.8%
1976Playoff8 87.5% 0.0% 12.5%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 100.0% 0.0% 75.0%
1972Skupinová fáza36 83.3% 11.1% 5.6%  ¦  93.8% 6.3%  ¦  69.4% 30.6% 86.1% 13.9% 87.5%
1972Playoff2 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
1968Skupinová fáza24 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  70.8% 29.2% 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%
1968Playoff8 62.5% 12.5% 25.0%  ¦  71.4% 28.6%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 87.5% 12.5% 42.9%
1964Skupinová fáza18 72.2% 22.2% 5.6%  ¦  92.9% 7.1%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 88.9% 11.1% 85.7%
1964Playoff11 63.6% 0.0% 36.4%  ¦  63.6% 36.4%  ¦  81.8% 18.2% 90.9% 9.1% 27.3%
1960Skupinová fáza24 79.2% 16.7% 4.2%  ¦  95.0% 5.0%  ¦  87.5% 12.5% 100.0% 0.0% 90.0%
1960Playoff4 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
1956Playoff12 66.7% 16.7% 16.7%  ¦  81.8% 18.2%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 75.0% 25.0% 63.6%
1952Playoff26 69.2% 15.4% 15.4%  ¦  84.0% 16.0%  ¦  80.8% 19.2% 96.2% 3.8% 68.0%
1948Playoff18 61.1% 11.1% 27.8%  ¦  72.2% 27.8%  ¦  88.9% 11.1% 94.4% 5.6% 44.4%
1936Playoff16 62.5% 18.8% 18.8%  ¦  81.3% 18.8%  ¦  68.8% 31.3% 93.8% 6.3% 62.5%
1928Playoff22 45.5% 13.6% 40.9%  ¦  52.6% 47.4%  ¦  86.4% 13.6% 100.0% 0.0% 5.3%
1924Playoff24 58.3% 12.5% 29.2%  ¦  68.2% 31.8%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% 36.4%
1920Playoff17 47.1% 11.8% 41.2%  ¦  58.8% 41.2%  ¦  82.4% 17.6% 94.1% 5.9% 17.6%
1912Playoff17 47.1% 11.8% 41.2%  ¦  47.1% 52.9%  ¦  88.2% 11.8% 88.2% 11.8% -5.9%
1908Playoff6 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3%
1904Playoff2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%  ¦  0.0% 100.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% -100.0%
1900Základná časť2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Kliknite na hocijaký stĺpec, aby ste zoradili tabuľku
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

AnnaBet Sila výkonnosti

Updated 2025-04-21 11:25:15
#Tím Rating
1. Španielsko 1631
2. Maroko 1545
3. Kolumbia 1496
4. Mexiko 1368
5. Taliansko 1353
6. Austrália 1350
7. Dánsko 1349
8. Paraguaj 1313
9. Južná Kórea 1303
10. USA 1292
11. Egypt 1249
12. Katar 1182
13. Švédsko 1159
14. Poľsko 1147
15. Ghana 1031
16. Kuvajt 978


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings		 Higher
Rated		 Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.