AnnaBet.com
Välkommen Gäst   Logga In   Register Registrera eller logga in
Web Store    Facebook   Twitter   Kontakta oss

Fotboll

England Italien Spanien Tyskland Frankrike Nederländerna Belgien Portugal Skottland Ryssland
Internationell Albanien Algeria Argentina Armenien Australien Azerbaijan Bahrain Bolivia Bosnia & Herzegovina Brasilien Bulgaria Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cypern Danmark Ecuador Egypten El Salvador Estland Färöarna Finland Georgien Grekland Guatemala Honduras Hong Kong Indien Indonesia Irak Iran Island Israel Jamaica Japan Jordan Kanada Kazakstan Kenya Kina Kroatien Kuwait Lettland Litauen Luxembourg Malaysia Malta Mexiko Moldova Montenegro Morocco New Zealand Nicaragua Norge North Ireland North Macedonia Österrike Paraguay Peru Polen Qatar Republic of Ireland Rumänien San Marino Saudi Arabia Schweiz Serbien Singapore Slovakien Slovenien Sverige Sydafrika Sydkorea Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Tjeckien Tunisien Turkiet Turkmenistan USA Uganda Ukraina Ungern United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Vitryssland Wales

  U19-Europamästerskapet 2015 @ Grekland

Group A

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Frankrike U19 3 3 0 0 6 1 +5 9 3.00 100% 2.00 0.33
2. Grekland U19 3 1 1 1 2 2 0 4 1.33 33% 0.67 0.67
3. Österrike U19 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00
4. Ukraina U19 3 0 1 2 3 7 -4 1 0.33 0% 1.00 2.33

Group B
# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Ryssland U19 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 4 1.33 33% 1.67 1.33
2. Spanien U19 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 4 1.33 33% 1.67 1.33
3. Nederländerna U19 3 1 1 1 2 2 0 4 1.33 33% 0.67 0.67
4. Tyskland U19 3 1 1 1 3 5 -2 4 1.33 33% 1.00 1.67


Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

Välj säsong


2024
2023
2022
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008


Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

Söndag 19. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Playoffs - Finals2015 Odds 1x2
Spanien U19    2 - 0    Ryssland U192.043.313.49
   
Torsdag 16. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals2015 Odds 1x2
Frankrike U19    0 - 2    Spanien U192.593.122.70
Ryssland U19    4 - 0    Grekland U191.953.253.81
   
Måndag 13. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group B2015 Odds 1x2
Ryssland U19    2 - 2    Tyskland U193.913.451.87
Spanien U19    1 - 1    Nederländerna U191.663.714.88
   
Söndag 12. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group A2015 Odds 1x2
Frankrike U19    2 - 0    Grekland U192.172.743.88
Ukraina U19    2 - 2    Österrike U193.453.372.01
   
Fredag 10. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group B2015 Odds 1x2
Tyskland U19    1 - 0    Nederländerna U192.083.353.38
Spanien U19    1 - 3    Ryssland U191.514.006.09
   
Torsdag 9. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group A2015 Odds 1x2
Grekland U19    0 - 0    Österrike U193.073.172.26
Ukraina U19    1 - 3    Frankrike U194.043.421.86
   
Tisdag 7. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group B2015 Odds 1x2
Tyskland U19    0 - 3    Spanien U192.883.292.32
Nederländerna U19    1 - 0    Ryssland U192.473.232.73
   
Måndag 6. juli 2015
   
U19-Europamästerskapet - Group A2015 Odds 1x2
Österrike U19    0 - 1    Frankrike U194.223.561.78
Grekland U19    2 - 0    Ukraina U192.773.202.45

Flera resultat


juli 2015

Frankrike U19
Grekland U19
Nederländerna U19
Österrike U19
Ryssland U19
Spanien U19
Tyskland U19
Ukraina U19


Välj säsong


2024
2023
2022
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008


Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Spanien U19 5 3 1 1 9 4 +5 10 2.00 60% 1.80 0.80
2. Frankrike U19 4 3 0 1 6 3 +3 9 2.25 75% 1.50 0.75
3. Ryssland U19 5 2 1 2 9 6 +3 7 1.40 40% 1.80 1.20
4. Nederländerna U19 3 1 1 1 2 2 0 4 1.33 33% 0.67 0.67
5. Tyskland U19 3 1 1 1 3 5 -2 4 1.33 33% 1.00 1.67
6. Grekland U19 4 1 1 2 2 6 -4 4 1.00 25% 0.50 1.50
7. Österrike U19 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00
8. Ukraina U19 3 0 1 2 3 7 -4 1 0.33 0% 1.00 2.33

-
Säsong Matcher 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Över 2.5 Under 2.5 Över 1.5 Under 1.5 Hemfördel
2024Group Stage12 33.3% 41.7% 25.0%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% 14.3%
2024Playoff4 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  0.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
2023Group Stage12 25.0% 33.3% 41.7%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% -25.0%
2023Playoff3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7%  ¦  33.3% 66.7%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% -33.3%
2022Group Stage12 50.0% 8.3% 41.7%  ¦  54.5% 45.5%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 75.0% 25.0% 9.1%
2022Playoff4 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
2019Group Stage12 33.3% 25.0% 41.7%  ¦  44.4% 55.6%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 75.0% 25.0% -11.1%
2019Playoff3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% -33.3%
2018Group Stage12 16.7% 16.7% 66.7%  ¦  20.0% 80.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% -60.0%
2018Playoff4 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2017Group Stage12 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0%
2017Playoff3 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3%
2016Group Stage12 8.3% 25.0% 66.7%  ¦  11.1% 88.9%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 91.7% 8.3% -77.8%
2016Playoff4 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2015Group Stage12 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%
2015Playoff3 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3%
2014Group Stage12 33.3% 16.7% 50.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% -20.0%
2014Playoff3 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
2013Group Stage12 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
2013Playoff3 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% -33.3%
2012Group Stage12 25.0% 16.7% 58.3%  ¦  30.0% 70.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 91.7% 8.3% -40.0%
2012Playoff3 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3%
2011Group Stage12 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 11.1%
2011Playoff3 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3%
2010Group Stage12 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
2010Playoff3 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3%
2009Group Stage12 16.7% 41.7% 41.7%  ¦  28.6% 71.4%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 66.7% 33.3% -42.9%
2009Playoff3 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
2008Group Stage12 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 33.3% 11.1%
2008Playoff3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%  ¦  33.3% 66.7%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% -33.3%

Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

AnnaBet Power Ratings

Updated 2025-04-02 12:15:46
#Lag Rating
1. Spanien U19 1442
2. Frankrike U19 1289
3. Tyskland U19 1235
4. Ryssland U19 1234
5. Nederländerna U19 1231
6. Österrike U19 1206
7. Ukraina U19 1156
8. Grekland U19 1050


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings
Higher
Rated
Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.