# |
Lag |
S |
V |
O |
F |
GM |
IM |
Diff |
P |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGM |
ØIM |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
34 |
25 |
3 |
6 |
91 |
28 |
+63 |
78 |
2.29 |
74% |
2.68 |
0.82 |
2. | Shandong Taishan |
34 |
25 |
3 |
6 |
87 |
29 |
+58 |
78 |
2.29 |
74% |
2.56 |
0.85 |
3. | Zhejiang Professiona |
34 |
18 |
11 |
5 |
64 |
28 |
+36 |
65 |
1.91 |
53% |
1.88 |
0.82 |
4. | Shanghai Port |
34 |
20 |
5 |
9 |
55 |
25 |
+30 |
65 |
1.91 |
59% |
1.62 |
0.74 |
5. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
34 |
18 |
11 |
5 |
49 |
28 |
+21 |
65 |
1.91 |
53% |
1.44 |
0.82 |
6. | Henan Songshan Longm |
34 |
17 |
8 |
9 |
60 |
32 |
+28 |
59 |
1.74 |
50% |
1.76 |
0.94 |
7. | Beijing Guoan |
34 |
17 |
7 |
10 |
57 |
49 |
+8 |
58 |
1.71 |
50% |
1.68 |
1.44 |
8. | Shanghai Shenhua |
34 |
14 |
11 |
9 |
42 |
34 |
+8 |
53 |
1.56 |
41% |
1.24 |
1.00 |
9. | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger |
34 |
14 |
7 |
13 |
45 |
42 |
+3 |
49 |
1.44 |
41% |
1.32 |
1.24 |
10. | Meizhou Hakka |
34 |
14 |
7 |
13 |
43 |
41 |
+2 |
49 |
1.44 |
41% |
1.26 |
1.21 |
11. | Dalian Professional |
34 |
13 |
9 |
12 |
51 |
50 |
+1 |
48 |
1.41 |
38% |
1.50 |
1.47 |
12. | Changchun Yatai |
34 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
49 |
50 |
-1 |
44 |
1.29 |
32% |
1.44 |
1.47 |
13. | Cangzhou Mighty Lion |
34 |
11 |
11 |
12 |
47 |
51 |
-4 |
44 |
1.29 |
32% |
1.38 |
1.50 |
14. | Shenzhen Ruby |
34 |
9 |
3 |
22 |
29 |
74 |
-45 |
30 |
0.88 |
26% |
0.85 |
2.18 |
15. | Wuhan FC |
34 |
8 |
4 |
22 |
34 |
71 |
-37 |
28 |
0.82 |
24% |
1.00 |
2.09 |
16. | Guangzhou City |
34 |
5 |
5 |
24 |
29 |
64 |
-35 |
20 |
0.59 |
15% |
0.85 |
1.88 |
17. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
34 |
3 |
8 |
23 |
24 |
63 |
-39 |
17 |
0.50 |
9% |
0.71 |
1.85 |
18. | Hebei China Fortune |
34 |
2 |
0 |
32 |
18 |
115 |
-97 |
6 |
0.18 |
6% |
0.53 |
3.38 |
# |
Lag |
S |
V |
O |
F |
GM |
IM |
Diff |
P |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGM |
ØIM |
1. | Shandong Taishan |
17 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
52 |
7 |
+45 |
46 |
2.71 |
88% |
3.06 |
0.41 |
2. | Wuhan Three Towns |
17 |
12 |
1 |
4 |
55 |
18 |
+37 |
37 |
2.18 |
71% |
3.24 |
1.06 |
3. | Zhejiang Professiona |
17 |
11 |
4 |
2 |
32 |
10 |
+22 |
37 |
2.18 |
65% |
1.88 |
0.59 |
4. | Shanghai Port |
17 |
11 |
2 |
4 |
31 |
10 |
+21 |
35 |
2.06 |
65% |
1.82 |
0.59 |
5. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
17 |
9 |
7 |
1 |
33 |
14 |
+19 |
34 |
2.00 |
53% |
1.94 |
0.82 |
6. | Henan Songshan Longm |
17 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
34 |
17 |
+17 |
32 |
1.88 |
59% |
2.00 |
1.00 |
7. | Meizhou Hakka |
17 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
30 |
18 |
+12 |
30 |
1.76 |
53% |
1.76 |
1.06 |
8. | Beijing Guoan |
17 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
28 |
22 |
+6 |
28 |
1.65 |
47% |
1.65 |
1.29 |
9. | Shanghai Shenhua |
17 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
19 |
15 |
+4 |
28 |
1.65 |
47% |
1.12 |
0.88 |
10. | Dalian Professional |
17 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
27 |
22 |
+5 |
26 |
1.53 |
41% |
1.59 |
1.29 |
11. | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger |
17 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
23 |
17 |
+6 |
25 |
1.47 |
41% |
1.35 |
1.00 |
12. | Changchun Yatai |
17 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
19 |
19 |
0 |
20 |
1.18 |
29% |
1.12 |
1.12 |
13. | Cangzhou Mighty Lion |
17 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
13 |
20 |
-7 |
17 |
1.00 |
18% |
0.76 |
1.18 |
14. | Wuhan FC |
17 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
19 |
33 |
-14 |
16 |
0.94 |
24% |
1.12 |
1.94 |
15. | Shenzhen Ruby |
17 |
5 |
1 |
11 |
13 |
32 |
-19 |
16 |
0.94 |
29% |
0.76 |
1.88 |
16. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
31 |
-14 |
11 |
0.65 |
12% |
1.00 |
1.82 |
17. | Guangzhou City |
17 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
16 |
36 |
-20 |
11 |
0.65 |
18% |
0.94 |
2.12 |
18. | Hebei China Fortune |
17 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
11 |
61 |
-50 |
6 |
0.35 |
12% |
0.65 |
3.59 |
# |
Lag |
S |
V |
O |
F |
GM |
IM |
Diff |
P |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGM |
ØIM |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
17 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
36 |
10 |
+26 |
41 |
2.41 |
76% |
2.12 |
0.59 |
2. | Shandong Taishan |
17 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
35 |
22 |
+13 |
32 |
1.88 |
59% |
2.06 |
1.29 |
3. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
17 |
9 |
4 |
4 |
16 |
14 |
+2 |
31 |
1.82 |
53% |
0.94 |
0.82 |
4. | Shanghai Port |
17 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
15 |
+9 |
30 |
1.76 |
53% |
1.41 |
0.88 |
5. | Beijing Guoan |
17 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
29 |
27 |
+2 |
30 |
1.76 |
53% |
1.71 |
1.59 |
6. | Zhejiang Professiona |
17 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
32 |
18 |
+14 |
28 |
1.65 |
41% |
1.88 |
1.06 |
7. | Henan Songshan Longm |
17 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
26 |
15 |
+11 |
27 |
1.59 |
41% |
1.53 |
0.88 |
8. | Cangzhou Mighty Lion |
17 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
34 |
31 |
+3 |
27 |
1.59 |
47% |
2.00 |
1.82 |
9. | Shanghai Shenhua |
17 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
23 |
19 |
+4 |
25 |
1.47 |
35% |
1.35 |
1.12 |
10. | Changchun Yatai |
17 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
30 |
31 |
-1 |
24 |
1.41 |
35% |
1.76 |
1.82 |
11. | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger |
17 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
22 |
25 |
-3 |
24 |
1.41 |
41% |
1.29 |
1.47 |
12. | Dalian Professional |
17 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
24 |
28 |
-4 |
22 |
1.29 |
35% |
1.41 |
1.65 |
13. | Meizhou Hakka |
17 |
5 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
23 |
-10 |
19 |
1.12 |
29% |
0.76 |
1.35 |
14. | Shenzhen Ruby |
17 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
16 |
42 |
-26 |
14 |
0.82 |
24% |
0.94 |
2.47 |
15. | Wuhan FC |
17 |
4 |
0 |
13 |
15 |
38 |
-23 |
12 |
0.71 |
24% |
0.88 |
2.24 |
16. | Guangzhou City |
17 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
13 |
28 |
-15 |
9 |
0.53 |
12% |
0.76 |
1.65 |
17. | Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
7 |
32 |
-25 |
6 |
0.35 |
6% |
0.41 |
1.88 |
18. | Hebei China Fortune |
17 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
7 |
54 |
-47 |
0 |
0.00 |
0% |
0.41 |
3.18 |
Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds | Välj säsong
Officiell sajt
Wikipedia
|