# |
Squadra |
PG |
V |
X |
P |
GF |
GS |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGF |
ØGS |
1. | Jiangsu Suning |
24 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
56 |
24 |
+32 |
59 |
2.46 |
79% |
2.33 |
1.00 |
2. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
24 |
12 |
7 |
5 |
34 |
19 |
+15 |
43 |
1.79 |
50% |
1.42 |
0.79 |
3. | Shanghai Shenxin |
24 |
11 |
9 |
4 |
37 |
24 |
+13 |
42 |
1.75 |
46% |
1.54 |
1.00 |
4. | Anhui Jiufang |
24 |
7 |
9 |
8 |
33 |
37 |
-4 |
30 |
1.25 |
29% |
1.38 |
1.54 |
5. | Shenzhen Peng City |
24 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
27 |
36 |
-9 |
29 |
1.21 |
29% |
1.12 |
1.50 |
6. | Shanghai Port |
24 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
26 |
30 |
-4 |
28 |
1.17 |
29% |
1.08 |
1.25 |
7. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
24 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
33 |
38 |
-5 |
28 |
1.17 |
29% |
1.38 |
1.58 |
8. | Yanbian Fude |
24 |
8 |
4 |
12 |
32 |
39 |
-7 |
28 |
1.17 |
33% |
1.33 |
1.62 |
9. | Beijing 361º |
24 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
27 |
39 |
-12 |
28 |
1.17 |
29% |
1.12 |
1.62 |
10. | Nanjing Yoyo |
24 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
35 |
38 |
-3 |
27 |
1.12 |
25% |
1.46 |
1.58 |
11. | Shanghai Zobon |
24 |
7 |
6 |
11 |
24 |
33 |
-9 |
27 |
1.12 |
29% |
1.00 |
1.38 |
12. | Beijing Sport Univer |
24 |
5 |
11 |
8 |
24 |
24 |
0 |
26 |
1.08 |
21% |
1.00 |
1.00 |
13. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
24 |
5 |
10 |
9 |
28 |
35 |
-7 |
25 |
1.04 |
21% |
1.17 |
1.46 |
# |
Squadra |
PG |
V |
X |
P |
GF |
GS |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGF |
ØGS |
1. | Jiangsu Suning |
12 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
32 |
12 |
+20 |
34 |
2.83 |
92% |
2.67 |
1.00 |
2. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
7 |
5 |
0 |
22 |
10 |
+12 |
26 |
2.17 |
58% |
1.83 |
0.83 |
3. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
11 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
10 |
+10 |
24 |
2.18 |
64% |
1.82 |
0.91 |
4. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
15 |
11 |
+4 |
23 |
1.92 |
58% |
1.25 |
0.92 |
5. | Anhui Jiufang |
12 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
24 |
17 |
+7 |
22 |
1.83 |
50% |
2.00 |
1.42 |
6. | Yanbian Fude |
13 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
20 |
16 |
+4 |
21 |
1.62 |
46% |
1.54 |
1.23 |
7. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
19 |
15 |
+4 |
19 |
1.58 |
42% |
1.58 |
1.25 |
8. | Shenzhen Peng City |
11 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
15 |
11 |
+4 |
19 |
1.73 |
45% |
1.36 |
1.00 |
9. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
12 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
14 |
13 |
+1 |
18 |
1.50 |
42% |
1.17 |
1.08 |
10. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
15 |
22 |
-7 |
16 |
1.33 |
33% |
1.25 |
1.83 |
11. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
8 |
+2 |
15 |
1.25 |
25% |
0.83 |
0.67 |
12. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
12 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
18 |
20 |
-2 |
14 |
1.17 |
25% |
1.50 |
1.67 |
13. | Shanghai Port |
13 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
15 |
-3 |
13 |
1.00 |
23% |
0.92 |
1.15 |
# |
Squadra |
PG |
V |
X |
P |
GF |
GS |
Diff |
Pts |
Pts/G |
V% |
ØGF |
ØGS |
1. | Jiangsu Suning |
12 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
12 |
+12 |
25 |
2.08 |
67% |
2.00 |
1.00 |
2. | Chongqing Liangjiang |
13 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
14 |
9 |
+5 |
19 |
1.46 |
38% |
1.08 |
0.69 |
3. | Shanghai Shenxin |
12 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
15 |
14 |
+1 |
16 |
1.33 |
33% |
1.25 |
1.17 |
4. | Shanghai Port |
11 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
14 |
15 |
-1 |
15 |
1.36 |
36% |
1.27 |
1.36 |
5. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
12 |
17 |
-5 |
12 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.00 |
1.42 |
6. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
14 |
16 |
-2 |
11 |
0.92 |
17% |
1.17 |
1.33 |
7. | Zhejiang Yiteng |
12 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
-5 |
11 |
0.92 |
17% |
0.83 |
1.25 |
8. | Qingdao Hailifeng |
12 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
19 |
25 |
-6 |
10 |
0.83 |
17% |
1.58 |
2.08 |
9. | Shenzhen Peng City |
13 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
12 |
25 |
-13 |
10 |
0.77 |
15% |
0.92 |
1.92 |
10. | Nanjing Yoyo |
12 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
16 |
23 |
-7 |
8 |
0.67 |
8% |
1.33 |
1.92 |
11. | Anhui Jiufang |
12 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
20 |
-11 |
8 |
0.67 |
8% |
0.75 |
1.67 |
12. | Yanbian Fude |
11 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
12 |
23 |
-11 |
7 |
0.64 |
18% |
1.09 |
2.09 |
13. | Shanghai Zobon |
12 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
9 |
22 |
-13 |
4 |
0.33 |
0% |
0.75 |
1.83 |
Clicca su ogni colonna per ordinare in ordine decrescente Percentuali mouseover (%) per vedere le probabilità di valore | Scegli la stagione
Sito ufficiale
Wikipedia |