AnnaBet.com
Välkommen Gäst   Logga In   Register Registrera eller logga in
Web Store    Facebook   Twitter   Kontakta oss

Fotboll

England Italien Spanien Tyskland Frankrike Nederländerna Belgien Portugal Skottland Ryssland
Internationell Albanien Algeria Argentina Armenien Australien Azerbaijan Bahrain Bolivia Bosnia & Herzegovina Brasilien Bulgaria Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cypern Danmark Ecuador Egypten El Salvador Estland Färöarna Finland Georgien Grekland Guatemala Honduras Hong Kong Indien Indonesia Irak Iran Island Israel Jamaica Japan Jordan Kanada Kazakstan Kenya Kina Kroatien Kuwait Lettland Litauen Luxembourg Malaysia Malta Mexiko Moldova Montenegro Morocco New Zealand Nicaragua Norge North Ireland North Macedonia Österrike Paraguay Peru Polen Qatar Republic of Ireland Rumänien San Marino Saudi Arabia Schweiz Serbien Singapore Slovakien Slovenien Sverige Sydafrika Sydkorea Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Tjeckien Tunisien Turkiet Turkmenistan USA Uganda Ukraina Ungern United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Vitryssland Wales

  Copa America 1910

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Argentina 2 2 0 0 9 2 +7 6 3.00 100% 4.50 1.00
2. Uruguay 2 1 0 1 4 4 0 3 1.50 50% 2.00 2.00
3. Chile 2 0 0 2 1 8 -7 0 0.00 0% 0.50 4.00


Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

Välj säsong

2024
2021
2019
2016
2015
2011
2007
2004
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1983
1979
1975
1967
1963
1959
1957
1956
1955
1953
1949
1947
1946
1945
1942
1941
1939
1937
1936
1935
1929
1927
1926
1925
1924
1923
1922
1921
1920
1919
1917
1916
1910

Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

Söndag 12. juni 1910
   
Copa America1910 Odds 1x2
Argentina    4 - 1    Uruguay
   
Söndag 5. juni 1910
   
Argentina    5 - 1    Chile
   
Söndag 29. maj 1910
   
Uruguay    3 - 0    Chile

Flera resultat

juni 1910
maj 1910

Argentina
Chile
Uruguay

Välj säsong

2024
2021
2019
2016
2015
2011
2007
2004
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1983
1979
1975
1967
1963
1959
1957
1956
1955
1953
1949
1947
1946
1945
1942
1941
1939
1937
1936
1935
1929
1927
1926
1925
1924
1923
1922
1921
1920
1919
1917
1916
1910

Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Argentina 2 2 0 0 9 2 +7 6 3.00 100% 4.50 1.00
2. Uruguay 2 1 0 1 4 4 0 3 1.50 50% 2.00 2.00
3. Chile 2 0 0 2 1 8 -7 0 0.00 0% 0.50 4.00

-
Säsong Matcher 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Över 2.5 Under 2.5 Över 1.5 Under 1.5 Hemfördel
2024Group Stage24 50.0% 20.8% 29.2%  ¦  63.2% 36.8%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 62.5% 37.5% 26.3%
2024Playoff8 25.0% 62.5% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
2021Group Stage20 45.0% 30.0% 25.0%  ¦  64.3% 35.7%  ¦  40.0% 60.0% 65.0% 35.0% 28.6%
2021Playoff8 62.5% 37.5% 0.0%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 50.0% 50.0% 75.0%
2019Group Stage18 27.8% 33.3% 38.9%  ¦  41.7% 58.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 72.2% 27.8% -16.7%
2019Playoff8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 0.0%
2016Group Stage24 58.3% 16.7% 25.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 70.8% 29.2% 40.0%
2016Playoff8 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%  ¦  25.0% 75.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 62.5% 37.5% -50.0%
2015Group Stage18 50.0% 27.8% 22.2%  ¦  69.2% 30.8%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 50.0% 50.0% 38.5%
2015Playoff8 50.0% 37.5% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 50.0%
2011Group Stage18 50.0% 44.4% 5.6%  ¦  90.0% 10.0%  ¦  27.8% 72.2% 55.6% 44.4% 80.0%
2011Playoff8 25.0% 50.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% -25.0%
2007Group Stage18 44.4% 22.2% 33.3%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 66.7% 33.3% 14.3%
2007Playoff8 37.5% 12.5% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% -25.0%
2004Group Stage18 55.6% 27.8% 16.7%  ¦  76.9% 23.1%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 72.2% 27.8% 53.8%
2004Playoff8 50.0% 25.0% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% 25.0%
2001Group Stage18 55.6% 16.7% 27.8%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  27.8% 72.2% 55.6% 44.4% 33.3%
2001Playoff8 37.5% 12.5% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 87.5% 12.5% -25.0%
1999Group Stage18 72.2% 11.1% 16.7%  ¦  81.3% 18.8%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 66.7% 33.3% 62.5%
1999Playoff8 50.0% 37.5% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 100.0% 0.0% 25.0%
1997Group Stage18 55.6% 16.7% 27.8%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  27.8% 72.2% 72.2% 27.8% 33.3%
1997Playoff8 62.5% 12.5% 25.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% 50.0%
1995Group Stage18 61.1% 16.7% 22.2%  ¦  73.3% 26.7%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 77.8% 22.2% 46.7%
1995Playoff8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 75.0% 25.0% 50.0%
1993Group Stage18 55.6% 44.4% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
1993Playoff8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 75.0% 25.0% 50.0%
1991Group Stage26 65.4% 23.1% 11.5%  ¦  85.0% 15.0%  ¦  46.2% 53.8% 80.8% 19.2% 70.0%
1989Group Stage26 57.7% 30.8% 11.5%  ¦  83.3% 16.7%  ¦  38.5% 61.5% 57.7% 42.3% 66.7%
1987Group Stage9 55.6% 33.3% 11.1%  ¦  83.3% 16.7%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 88.9% 11.1% 66.7%
1987Playoff4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0%  ¦  25.0% 75.0%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 25.0% 75.0% -50.0%
1983Group Stage18 44.4% 38.9% 16.7%  ¦  72.7% 27.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 66.7% 33.3% 45.5%
1983Playoff6 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  0.0% 100.0% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%
1979Group Stage18 66.7% 27.8% 5.6%  ¦  92.3% 7.7%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 83.3% 16.7% 84.6%
1979Playoff7 42.9% 42.9% 14.3%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  57.1% 42.9% 57.1% 42.9% 50.0%
1975Group Stage18 55.6% 11.1% 33.3%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 77.8% 22.2% 25.0%
1975Playoff7 71.4% 0.0% 28.6%  ¦  71.4% 28.6%  ¦  28.6% 71.4% 57.1% 42.9% 42.9%
1967Grundserien15 86.7% 13.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  53.3% 46.7% 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%
1963Grundserien21 81.0% 19.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  76.2% 23.8% 95.2% 4.8% 100.0%
1959Grundserien31 74.2% 19.4% 6.5%  ¦  92.0% 8.0%  ¦  77.4% 22.6% 93.5% 6.5% 84.0%
1957Grundserien21 85.7% 4.8% 9.5%  ¦  90.0% 10.0%  ¦  81.0% 19.0% 85.7% 14.3% 80.0%
1956Grundserien15 80.0% 20.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
1955Grundserien15 73.3% 20.0% 6.7%  ¦  91.7% 8.3%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 93.3% 6.7% 83.3%
1953Grundserien22 63.6% 27.3% 9.1%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  59.1% 40.9% 72.7% 27.3% 75.0%
1949Grundserien29 89.7% 6.9% 3.4%  ¦  96.3% 3.7%  ¦  86.2% 13.8% 93.1% 6.9% 92.6%
1947Grundserien28 64.3% 21.4% 14.3%  ¦  81.8% 18.2%  ¦  64.3% 35.7% 82.1% 17.9% 63.6%
1946Grundserien15 93.3% 6.7% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  73.3% 26.7% 93.3% 6.7% 100.0%
1945Grundserien21 81.0% 14.3% 4.8%  ¦  94.4% 5.6%  ¦  61.9% 38.1% 81.0% 19.0% 88.9%
1942Grundserien21 81.0% 19.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 81.0% 19.0% 100.0%
1941Grundserien10 80.0% 0.0% 20.0%  ¦  80.0% 20.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 70.0% 30.0% 60.0%
1939Grundserien10 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
1937Grundserien14 85.7% 7.1% 7.1%  ¦  92.3% 7.7%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 78.6% 21.4% 84.6%
1936Grundserien2 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
1935Grundserien6 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3%
1929Grundserien6 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  83.3% 16.7% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
1927Grundserien6 66.7% 0.0% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3%
1926Grundserien10 80.0% 10.0% 10.0%  ¦  88.9% 11.1%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 100.0% 0.0% 77.8%
1925Grundserien6 83.3% 16.7% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  83.3% 16.7% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
1924Grundserien6 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
1923Grundserien6 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%
1922Grundserien11 72.7% 27.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  27.3% 72.7% 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
1921Grundserien6 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
1920Grundserien6 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0%
1919Grundserien7 85.7% 14.3% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 85.7% 14.3% 100.0%
1917Grundserien6 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
1916Grundserien6 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%
1910Grundserien3 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

AnnaBet Power Ratings

Updated 2025-04-06 15:57:36
#Lag Rating
1. Argentina 1580
2. Uruguay 1439
3. Chile 1164


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings		 Higher
Rated		 Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.