AnnaBet.com
Välkommen Gäst   Logga In   Register Registrera eller logga in
Web Store    Facebook   Twitter   Kontakta oss

Fotboll

England Italien Spanien Tyskland Frankrike Nederländerna Belgien Portugal Skottland Ryssland
Internationell Albanien Algeria Argentina Armenien Australien Azerbaijan Bahrain Bolivia Bosnia & Herzegovina Brasilien Bulgaria Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cypern Danmark Ecuador Egypten El Salvador Estland Färöarna Finland Georgien Grekland Guatemala Honduras Hong Kong Indien Indonesia Irak Iran Island Israel Jamaica Japan Jordan Kanada Kazakstan Kenya Kina Kroatien Kuwait Lettland Litauen Luxembourg Malaysia Malta Mexiko Moldova Montenegro Morocco New Zealand Nicaragua Norge North Ireland North Macedonia Österrike Paraguay Peru Polen Qatar Republic of Ireland Rumänien San Marino Saudi Arabia Schweiz Serbien Singapore Slovakien Slovenien Sverige Sydafrika Sydkorea Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Tjeckien Tunisien Turkiet Turkmenistan USA Uganda Ukraina Ungern United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Vitryssland Wales

  World Cup Qualifiers: Oceania (OFC) 1990

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Israel 4 1 3 0 5 4 +1 6 1.50 25% 1.25 1.00
2. Australien 4 1 2 1 6 5 +1 5 1.25 25% 1.50 1.25
3. New Zealand 4 1 1 2 5 7 -2 4 1.00 25% 1.25 1.75

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Australien 2 1 1 0 5 2 +3 4 2.00 50% 2.50 1.00
2. New Zealand 2 1 1 0 4 2 +2 4 2.00 50% 2.00 1.00
3. Israel 2 1 1 0 2 1 +1 4 2.00 50% 1.00 0.50

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Israel 2 0 2 0 3 3 0 2 1.00 0% 1.50 1.50
2. Australien 2 0 1 1 1 3 -2 1 0.50 0% 0.50 1.50
3. New Zealand 2 0 0 2 1 5 -4 0 0.00 0% 0.50 2.50


Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

Välj säsong


2026
2022
2018
2014
2010
2006
2002
1998
1994
1990
1986


Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

Söndag 16. april 1989
   
World Cup Qualifiers: Oceania (OFC)1990 Odds 1x2
Australien    1 - 1    Israel
   
Söndag 9. april 1989
   
New Zealand    2 - 2    Israel
   
Söndag 2. april 1989
   
New Zealand    2 - 0    Australien
   
Söndag 19. mars 1989
   
Israel    1 - 1    Australien
   
Söndag 12. mars 1989
   
Australien    4 - 1    New Zealand
   
Söndag 5. mars 1989
   
Israel    1 - 0    New Zealand

Flera resultat


april 1989
mars 1989

Australien
Israel
New Zealand


Välj säsong


2026
2022
2018
2014
2010
2006
2002
1998
1994
1990
1986


Officiell sajt

Wikipedia

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Israel 4 1 3 0 5 4 +1 6 1.50 25% 1.25 1.00
2. Australien 4 1 2 1 6 5 +1 5 1.25 25% 1.50 1.25
3. New Zealand 4 1 1 2 5 7 -2 4 1.00 25% 1.25 1.75

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Australien 2 1 1 0 5 2 +3 4 2.00 50% 2.50 1.00
2. New Zealand 2 1 1 0 4 2 +2 4 2.00 50% 2.00 1.00
3. Israel 2 1 1 0 2 1 +1 4 2.00 50% 1.00 0.50

# Lag S V O F GM IM Diff P Pts/G V% ØGM ØIM
1. Israel 2 0 2 0 3 3 0 2 1.00 0% 1.50 1.50
2. Australien 2 0 1 1 1 3 -2 1 0.50 0% 0.50 1.50
3. New Zealand 2 0 0 2 1 5 -4 0 0.00 0% 0.50 2.50

-
Säsong Matcher 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Över 2.5 Under 2.5 Över 1.5 Under 1.5 Hemfördel
2026Playoff3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%  ¦  0.0% 100.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 100.0% 0.0% -100.0%
2026Group Stage12 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 91.7% 8.3% 0.0%
2022Group Stage11 54.5% 0.0% 45.5%  ¦  54.5% 45.5%  ¦  63.6% 36.4% 72.7% 27.3% 9.1%
2018Group Stage11 45.5% 18.2% 36.4%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  54.5% 45.5% 81.8% 18.2% 11.1%
2018Playoff2 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
2014Qualification6 50.0% 33.3% 16.7%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% 50.0%
2014Group Stage28 46.4% 10.7% 42.9%  ¦  52.0% 48.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 78.6% 21.4% 4.0%
2010Playoff4 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
2010Group Stage28 46.4% 10.7% 42.9%  ¦  52.0% 48.0%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 92.9% 7.1% 4.0%
2006Playoff2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2006Group Stage35 51.4% 14.3% 34.3%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  68.6% 31.4% 85.7% 14.3% 20.0%
2002Group Stage20 35.0% 0.0% 65.0%  ¦  35.0% 65.0%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 95.0% 5.0% -30.0%
2002Playoff2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1998Grundserien19 63.2% 5.3% 31.6%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  57.9% 42.1% 78.9% 21.1% 33.3%
1994Grundserien14 50.0% 14.3% 35.7%  ¦  58.3% 41.7%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 85.7% 14.3% 16.7%
1990Grundserien6 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0%  ¦  33.3% 66.7% 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%
1986Grundserien6 50.0% 33.3% 16.7%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% 50.0%

Klicka rubrikrad för att sortera tabell enligt kolumnen
Låt muspekaren vila över procent (%) för att se värde odds

AnnaBet Power Ratings

Updated 2025-02-17 11:25:39
#Lag Rating
1. Australien 1328
2. New Zealand 1220
3. Israel 983


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings
Higher
Rated
Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.