Копа Америка 1923

Все игры

#	Команда	И	В	Н	П	ЗГ	ПГ	Разн.	О	О/И	В%	ØЗГ	ØПГ
1.	Уругвай	3	3	0	0	6	1	+5	9	3.00	100%	2.00	0.33
2.	Аргентина	3	2	0	1	6	6	0	6	2.00	67%	2.00	2.00
3.	Парагвай	3	1	0	2	4	6	-2	3	1.00	33%	1.33	2.00
4.	Бразилия	3	0	0	3	2	5	-3	0	0.00	0%	0.67	1.67

Для сортировки таблицы нажмите на заголовок столбца.
Наведите курсор мыши на проценты (%), чтобы увидеть значение шансы

Выбрать сезон

2024
2021
2019
2016
2015
2011
2007
2004
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1983
1979
1975
1967
1963
1959
1957
1956
1955
1953
1949
1947
1946
1945
1942
1941
1939
1937
1936
1935
1929
1927
1926
1925
1924
1923
1922
1921
1920
1919
1917
1916
1910

Официальный сайт

Wikipedia

Воскресенье 2. Декабрь 1923

Копа Америка		1923	Коэффициенты 1x2
Уругвай	2 - 0	Аргентина

Воскресенье 25. Ноябрь 1923

Уругвай	2 - 1	Бразилия

Воскресенье 18. Ноябрь 1923

Аргентина	2 - 1	Бразилия

Воскресенье 11. Ноябрь 1923

Парагвай	1 - 0	Бразилия

Воскресенье 4. Ноябрь 1923

Уругвай	2 - 0	Парагвай

Понедельник 29. Октябрь 1923

Аргентина	4 - 3	Парагвай

Еще результаты

Декабря 1923
Ноября 1923
Октября 1923

Аргентина
Бразилия
Парагвай
Уругвай

Выбрать сезон

Официальный сайт

Wikipedia

Последние 6 матчей

#	Команда	И	В	Н	П	ЗГ	ПГ	Разн.	О	О/И	В%	ØЗГ	ØПГ
1.	Уругвай	3	3	0	0	6	1	+5	9	3.00	100%	2.00	0.33
2.	Аргентина	3	2	0	1	6	6	0	6	2.00	67%	2.00	2.00
3.	Парагвай	3	1	0	2	4	6	-2	3	1.00	33%	1.33	2.00
4.	Бразилия	3	0	0	3	2	5	-3	0	0.00	0%	0.67	1.67

Сезон		матчей	1	x	2	¦	1	2	¦	Больше 2.5	Меньше 2.5	Больше 1.5	Меньше 1.5	Домашнее преимущество
2024	групповой этап	24	50.0%	20.8%	29.2%	¦	63.2%	36.8%	¦	45.8%	54.2%	62.5%	37.5%	26.3%
2024	плей-офф	8	25.0%	62.5%	12.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	62.5%	37.5%	25.0%
2021	групповой этап	20	45.0%	30.0%	25.0%	¦	64.3%	35.7%	¦	40.0%	60.0%	65.0%	35.0%	28.6%
2021	плей-офф	8	62.5%	37.5%	0.0%	¦	87.5%	12.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	50.0%	50.0%	75.0%
2019	групповой этап	18	27.8%	33.3%	38.9%	¦	41.7%	58.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	72.2%	27.8%	-16.7%
2019	плей-офф	8	37.5%	37.5%	25.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	0.0%
2016	групповой этап	24	58.3%	16.7%	25.0%	¦	70.0%	30.0%	¦	58.3%	41.7%	70.8%	29.2%	40.0%
2016	плей-офф	8	25.0%	25.0%	50.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	62.5%	37.5%	-50.0%
2015	групповой этап	18	50.0%	27.8%	22.2%	¦	69.2%	30.8%	¦	38.9%	61.1%	50.0%	50.0%	38.5%
2015	плей-офф	8	50.0%	37.5%	12.5%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	50.0%
2011	групповой этап	18	50.0%	44.4%	5.6%	¦	90.0%	10.0%	¦	27.8%	72.2%	55.6%	44.4%	80.0%
2011	плей-офф	8	25.0%	50.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	62.5%	37.5%	-25.0%
2007	групповой этап	18	44.4%	22.2%	33.3%	¦	57.1%	42.9%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	66.7%	33.3%	14.3%
2007	плей-офф	8	37.5%	12.5%	50.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	-25.0%
2004	групповой этап	18	55.6%	27.8%	16.7%	¦	76.9%	23.1%	¦	61.1%	38.9%	72.2%	27.8%	53.8%
2004	плей-офф	8	50.0%	25.0%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	87.5%	12.5%	25.0%
2001	групповой этап	18	55.6%	16.7%	27.8%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	27.8%	72.2%	55.6%	44.4%	33.3%
2001	плей-офф	8	37.5%	12.5%	50.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	87.5%	12.5%	-25.0%
1999	групповой этап	18	72.2%	11.1%	16.7%	¦	81.3%	18.8%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	66.7%	33.3%	62.5%
1999	плей-офф	8	50.0%	37.5%	12.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	100.0%	0.0%	25.0%
1997	групповой этап	18	55.6%	16.7%	27.8%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	27.8%	72.2%	72.2%	27.8%	33.3%
1997	плей-офф	8	62.5%	12.5%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	87.5%	12.5%	50.0%
1995	групповой этап	18	61.1%	16.7%	22.2%	¦	73.3%	26.7%	¦	61.1%	38.9%	77.8%	22.2%	46.7%
1995	плей-офф	8	37.5%	50.0%	12.5%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
1993	групповой этап	18	55.6%	44.4%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	38.9%	61.1%	66.7%	33.3%	100.0%
1993	плей-офф	8	37.5%	37.5%	25.0%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	37.5%	62.5%	75.0%	25.0%	50.0%
1991	групповой этап	26	65.4%	23.1%	11.5%	¦	85.0%	15.0%	¦	46.2%	53.8%	80.8%	19.2%	70.0%
1989	групповой этап	26	57.7%	30.8%	11.5%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	38.5%	61.5%	57.7%	42.3%	66.7%
1987	групповой этап	9	55.6%	33.3%	11.1%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	88.9%	11.1%	66.7%
1987	плей-офф	4	0.0%	25.0%	75.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	¦	25.0%	75.0%	25.0%	75.0%	-50.0%
1983	групповой этап	18	44.4%	38.9%	16.7%	¦	72.7%	27.3%	¦	55.6%	44.4%	66.7%	33.3%	45.5%
1983	плей-офф	6	16.7%	66.7%	16.7%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	0.0%	100.0%	66.7%	33.3%	0.0%
1979	групповой этап	18	66.7%	27.8%	5.6%	¦	92.3%	7.7%	¦	61.1%	38.9%	83.3%	16.7%	84.6%
1979	плей-офф	7	42.9%	42.9%	14.3%	¦	75.0%	25.0%	¦	57.1%	42.9%	57.1%	42.9%	50.0%
1975	групповой этап	18	55.6%	11.1%	33.3%	¦	62.5%	37.5%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	77.8%	22.2%	25.0%
1975	плей-офф	7	71.4%	0.0%	28.6%	¦	71.4%	28.6%	¦	28.6%	71.4%	57.1%	42.9%	42.9%
1967	Регулярный сезон	15	86.7%	13.3%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	53.3%	46.7%	73.3%	26.7%	100.0%
1963	Регулярный сезон	21	81.0%	19.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	76.2%	23.8%	95.2%	4.8%	100.0%
1959	Регулярный сезон	31	74.2%	19.4%	6.5%	¦	92.0%	8.0%	¦	77.4%	22.6%	93.5%	6.5%	84.0%
1957	Регулярный сезон	21	85.7%	4.8%	9.5%	¦	90.0%	10.0%	¦	81.0%	19.0%	85.7%	14.3%	80.0%
1956	Регулярный сезон	15	80.0%	20.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	40.0%	60.0%	66.7%	33.3%	100.0%
1955	Регулярный сезон	15	73.3%	20.0%	6.7%	¦	91.7%	8.3%	¦	80.0%	20.0%	93.3%	6.7%	83.3%
1953	Регулярный сезон	22	63.6%	27.3%	9.1%	¦	87.5%	12.5%	¦	59.1%	40.9%	72.7%	27.3%	75.0%
1949	Регулярный сезон	29	89.7%	6.9%	3.4%	¦	96.3%	3.7%	¦	86.2%	13.8%	93.1%	6.9%	92.6%
1947	Регулярный сезон	28	64.3%	21.4%	14.3%	¦	81.8%	18.2%	¦	64.3%	35.7%	82.1%	17.9%	63.6%
1946	Регулярный сезон	15	93.3%	6.7%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	73.3%	26.7%	93.3%	6.7%	100.0%
1945	Регулярный сезон	21	81.0%	14.3%	4.8%	¦	94.4%	5.6%	¦	61.9%	38.1%	81.0%	19.0%	88.9%
1942	Регулярный сезон	21	81.0%	19.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	81.0%	19.0%	100.0%
1941	Регулярный сезон	10	80.0%	0.0%	20.0%	¦	80.0%	20.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	70.0%	30.0%	60.0%
1939	Регулярный сезон	10	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%
1937	Регулярный сезон	14	85.7%	7.1%	7.1%	¦	92.3%	7.7%	¦	71.4%	28.6%	78.6%	21.4%	84.6%
1936	Регулярный сезон	2	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%
1935	Регулярный сезон	6	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	66.7%	33.3%	33.3%
1929	Регулярный сезон	6	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%
1927	Регулярный сезон	6	66.7%	0.0%	33.3%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	33.3%
1926	Регулярный сезон	10	80.0%	10.0%	10.0%	¦	88.9%	11.1%	¦	80.0%	20.0%	100.0%	0.0%	77.8%
1925	Регулярный сезон	6	83.3%	16.7%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	83.3%	16.7%	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%
1924	Регулярный сезон	6	66.7%	33.3%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	100.0%
1923	Регулярный сезон	6	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	83.3%	16.7%	100.0%
1922	Регулярный сезон	11	72.7%	27.3%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	27.3%	72.7%	72.7%	27.3%	100.0%
1921	Регулярный сезон	6	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	66.7%	33.3%	100.0%
1920	Регулярный сезон	6	33.3%	33.3%	33.3%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	¦	33.3%	66.7%	83.3%	16.7%	0.0%
1919	Регулярный сезон	7	85.7%	14.3%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	71.4%	28.6%	85.7%	14.3%	100.0%
1917	Регулярный сезон	6	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	66.7%	33.3%	66.7%	33.3%	100.0%
1916	Регулярный сезон	6	50.0%	50.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	50.0%	50.0%	83.3%	16.7%	100.0%
1910	Регулярный сезон	3	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	¦	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	100.0%

AnnaBet Сила команд

Последнее обновление 2025-04-16 11:11:29

#	Команда	форма
1.	Аргентина	1580
2.	Бразилия	1478
3.	Уругвай	1439
4.	Парагвай	1313

Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference in Ratings	Higher Rated	Lower Rated
0	0.500	0.500
10	0.514	0.486
20	0.529	0.471
30	0.543	0.457
40	0.557	0.443
50	0.571	0.429
60	0.585	0.415
70	0.599	0.401
80	0.613	0.387
90	0.627	0.373
100	0.640	0.360
110	0.653	0.347
120	0.666	0.334
130	0.679	0.321
140	0.691	0.309
150	0.703	0.297
160	0.715	0.285
170	0.727	0.273
180	0.738	0.262
190	0.749	0.251
200	0.760	0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.