AnnaBet.com
Benvenuto ospite   Entra   Registro Registrati o entra
Negozio online    Facebook   Twitter   Contattaci

Calcio

Inghilterra
Italia
Spagna
Germania
Francia
Paesi Bassi
Belgio
Portogallo
Scozia
Russia
Internazionale
Albania
Algeria
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaigian
Bahrain Bielorussia
Bolivia
Bosnia-Erzegovina
Brasile
Bulgaria
Canada
Cile
Cina
Cipro
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croazia
Danimarca
Ecuador Egypt
El Salvador Estonia
Faroe Islands
Finlandia
Galles
Georgia
Giamaica Giappone
Grecia
Guatemala Honduras Hong Kong
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq Islanda
Israele
Jordan
Kazakistan
Kenya
Kuwait
Lettonia
Lituania
Lussemburgo
Malaysia Malta
Messico
Moldavia
Montenegro
Morocco Nicaragua North Ireland
North Macedonia
Norvegia
Nuova Zelanda Paraguay
Perù
Polonia
Qatar
Repubblica Ceca
Republic of Ireland
Romania
San Marino
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
Siria
Slovacchia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Stati Uniti
Svezia
Svizzera
Taiwan Tajikistan
Tanzania Thailandia
Tunisia
Turchia
Turkmenistan Ucraina
Uganda Ungheria
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Vietnam

  Coppa del Mondo U20 1995 @ Qatar

Group A

# Squadra PG V X P GF GS Diff Pts Pts/G V% ØGF ØGS
1. Brasile U20 3 2 1 0 8 0 +8 7 2.33 67% 2.67 0.00
2. Russia U20 3 1 2 0 3 1 +2 5 1.67 33% 1.00 0.33
3. Siria U20 3 1 0 2 1 8 -7 3 1.00 33% 0.33 2.67
4. Qatar U20 3 0 1 2 1 4 -3 1 0.33 0% 0.33 1.33

Group B
# Squadra PG V X P GF GS Diff Pts Pts/G V% ØGF ØGS
1. Spagna U20 3 3 0 0 13 5 +8 9 3.00 100% 4.33 1.67
2. Giappone U20 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 4 1.33 33% 1.67 1.33
3. Cile U20 3 0 2 1 6 9 -3 2 0.67 0% 2.00 3.00
4. Burundi U20 3 0 1 2 2 8 -6 1 0.33 0% 0.67 2.67

Group C
# Squadra PG V X P GF GS Diff Pts Pts/G V% ØGF ØGS
1. Portogallo U20 3 3 0 0 7 2 +5 9 3.00 100% 2.33 0.67
2. Argentina U20 3 2 0 1 5 3 +2 6 2.00 67% 1.67 1.00
3. Paesi Bassi U20 3 1 0 2 7 5 +2 3 1.00 33% 2.33 1.67
4. Honduras U20 3 0 0 3 5 14 -9 0 0.00 0% 1.67 4.67

Group D
# Squadra PG V X P GF GS Diff Pts Pts/G V% ØGF ØGS
1. Cameroon U20 3 2 1 0 7 4 +3 7 2.33 67% 2.33 1.33
2. Australia U20 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 4 1.33 33% 1.67 1.33
3. Costa Rica U20 3 1 0 2 3 6 -3 3 1.00 33% 1.00 2.00
4. Germania U20 3 0 2 1 3 4 -1 2 0.67 0% 1.00 1.33


Clicca su ogni colonna per ordinare in ordine decrescente
Percentuali mouseover (%) per vedere le probabilità di valore

Scegli la stagione

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Sito ufficiale

Wikipedia

Venerdì 28. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Playoffs - Finals1995 Quote 1x2
Brasile U20    0 - 2    Argentina U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Playoffs - Bronze1995 Quote 1x2
Portogallo U20    3 - 2    Spagna U20
   
Martedì 25. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals1995 Quote 1x2
Brasile U20    1 - 0    Portogallo U20
Spagna U20    0 - 3    Argentina U20
   
Domenica 23. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals1995 Quote 1x2
Brasile U20    2 - 1    Giappone U20
Cameroon U20    0 - 2    Argentina U20
Portogallo U20    2 - 1 AET Australia U20
Spagna U20    4 - 1    Russia U20
   
Giovedì 20. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group C1995 Quote 1x2
Argentina U20    4 - 2    Honduras U20
Paesi Bassi U20    0 - 3    Portogallo U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group D1995 Quote 1x2
Australia U20    1 - 1    Germania U20
Costa Rica U20    1 - 3    Cameroon U20
   
Mercoledì 19. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group A1995 Quote 1x2
Qatar U20    0 - 2    Brasile U20
Russia U20    2 - 0    Siria U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group B1995 Quote 1x2
Burundi U20    0 - 2    Giappone U20
Spagna U20    6 - 3    Cile U20
   
Lunedì 17. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group A1995 Quote 1x2
Russia U20    0 - 0    Brasile U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group B1995 Quote 1x2
Spagna U20    2 - 1    Giappone U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group C1995 Quote 1x2
Argentina U20    0 - 1    Portogallo U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group D1995 Quote 1x2
Costa Rica U20    2 - 1    Germania U20
   
Domenica 16. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group A1995 Quote 1x2
Qatar U20    0 - 1    Siria U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group B1995 Quote 1x2
Burundi U20    1 - 1    Cile U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group C1995 Quote 1x2
Paesi Bassi U20    7 - 1    Honduras U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group D1995 Quote 1x2
Australia U20    2 - 3    Cameroon U20
   
Venerdì 14. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group A1995 Quote 1x2
Siria U20    0 - 6    Brasile U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group B1995 Quote 1x2
Cile U20    2 - 2    Giappone U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group C1995 Quote 1x2
Honduras U20    2 - 3    Portogallo U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group D1995 Quote 1x2
Cameroon U20    1 - 1    Germania U20
   
Giovedì 13. aprile 1995
   
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group A1995 Quote 1x2
Qatar U20    1 - 1    Russia U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group B1995 Quote 1x2
Burundi U20    1 - 5    Spagna U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group C1995 Quote 1x2
Paesi Bassi U20    0 - 1    Argentina U20
Coppa del Mondo U20 - Group D1995 Quote 1x2
Australia U20    2 - 0    Costa Rica U20

Ulteriori risultati

aprile 1995

Argentina U20
Australia U20
Brasile U20
Burundi U20
Cameroon U20
Cile U20
Costa Rica U20
Germania U20
Giappone U20
Honduras U20
Paesi Bassi U20
Portogallo U20
Qatar U20
Russia U20
Siria U20
Spagna U20

Scegli la stagione

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Sito ufficiale

Wikipedia

# Squadra PG V X P GF GS Diff Pts Pts/G V% ØGF ØGS
1. Argentina U20 6 5 0 1 12 3 +9 15 2.50 83% 2.00 0.50
2. Brasile U20 6 4 1 1 11 3 +8 13 2.17 67% 1.83 0.50
3. Spagna U20 6 4 0 2 19 12 +7 12 2.00 67% 3.17 2.00
4. Portogallo U20 6 4 0 1 12 6 +6 12 2.00 83% 1.83 1.00
5. Cameroon U20 4 2 1 1 7 6 +1 7 1.75 50% 1.75 1.50
6. Russia U20 4 1 2 1 4 5 -1 5 1.25 25% 1.00 1.25
7. Australia U20 4 1 1 1 6 6 0 4 1.00 25% 1.50 1.25
8. Giappone U20 4 1 1 2 6 6 0 4 1.00 25% 1.50 1.50
9. Paesi Bassi U20 3 1 0 2 7 5 +2 3 1.00 33% 2.33 1.67
10. Costa Rica U20 3 1 0 2 3 6 -3 3 1.00 33% 1.00 2.00
11. Siria U20 3 1 0 2 1 8 -7 3 1.00 33% 0.33 2.67
12. Germania U20 3 0 2 1 3 4 -1 2 0.67 0% 1.00 1.33
13. Cile U20 3 0 2 1 6 9 -3 2 0.67 0% 2.00 3.00
14. Qatar U20 3 0 1 2 1 4 -3 1 0.33 0% 0.33 1.33
15. Burundi U20 3 0 1 2 2 8 -6 1 0.33 0% 0.67 2.67
16. Honduras U20 3 0 0 3 5 14 -9 0 0.00 0% 1.67 4.67

-
Stagione Gare 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Più 2.5 Meno 2.5 Più 1.5 Meno 1.5 Il fattore campo
2023Fase a gironi36 38.9% 16.7% 44.4%  ¦  46.7% 53.3%  ¦  63.9% 36.1% 80.6% 19.4% -6.7%
2023Playoffs16 43.8% 12.5% 43.8%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 68.8% 31.3% 12.5%
2019Fase a gironi36 36.1% 16.7% 47.2%  ¦  43.3% 56.7%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 77.8% 22.2% -13.3%
2019Playoffs16 37.5% 25.0% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 62.5% 37.5% 0.0%
2017Fase a gironi36 44.4% 25.0% 30.6%  ¦  59.3% 40.7%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 72.2% 27.8% 18.5%
2017Playoffs16 25.0% 43.8% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 56.3% 43.8% 0.0%
2015Fase a gironi36 36.1% 16.7% 47.2%  ¦  43.3% 56.7%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 86.1% 13.9% -13.3%
2015Playoffs16 25.0% 50.0% 25.0%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 12.5%
2013Fase a gironi36 30.6% 25.0% 44.4%  ¦  40.7% 59.3%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 83.3% 16.7% -18.5%
2013Playoffs16 31.3% 43.8% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 81.3% 18.8% 25.0%
2011Fase a gironi36 47.2% 25.0% 27.8%  ¦  63.0% 37.0%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 66.7% 33.3% 25.9%
2011Playoffs16 56.3% 37.5% 6.3%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 68.8% 31.3% 75.0%
2009Fase a gironi36 47.2% 19.4% 33.3%  ¦  58.6% 41.4%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% 17.2%
2009Playoffs16 25.0% 43.8% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  43.8% 56.3% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
2007Fase a gironi36 36.1% 27.8% 36.1%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 69.4% 30.6% 0.0%
2007Playoffs16 31.3% 37.5% 31.3%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 68.8% 31.3% 12.5%
2005Fase a gironi36 47.2% 19.4% 33.3%  ¦  58.6% 41.4%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 75.0% 25.0% 17.2%
2005Playoffs16 50.0% 18.8% 31.3%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  68.8% 31.3% 81.3% 18.8% 25.0%
2003Fase a gironi36 38.9% 22.2% 38.9%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 63.9% 36.1% 0.0%
2003Playoffs16 31.3% 37.5% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  18.8% 81.3% 56.3% 43.8% 0.0%
2001Fase a gironi36 27.8% 22.2% 50.0%  ¦  35.7% 64.3%  ¦  52.8% 47.2% 75.0% 25.0% -28.6%
2001Playoffs16 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 81.3% 18.8% 0.0%
1999Fase a gironi36 47.2% 16.7% 36.1%  ¦  56.7% 43.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 75.0% 25.0% 13.3%
1999Playoffs16 43.8% 31.3% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 93.8% 6.3% 25.0%
1997Fase a gironi36 27.8% 25.0% 47.2%  ¦  37.0% 63.0%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 80.6% 19.4% -25.9%
1997Playoffs16 31.3% 25.0% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  43.8% 56.3% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
1995Fase a gironi24 29.2% 25.0% 45.8%  ¦  38.9% 61.1%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% -22.2%
1995Playoffs8 50.0% 12.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 87.5% 12.5% 25.0%
1993Fase a gironi24 33.3% 29.2% 37.5%  ¦  47.1% 52.9%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 79.2% 20.8% -5.9%
1993Playoffs8 37.5% 25.0% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
1991Fase a gironi24 41.7% 29.2% 29.2%  ¦  58.8% 41.2%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 62.5% 37.5% 17.6%
1991Playoffs8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 75.0% 25.0% 50.0%
1989Fase a gironi24 45.8% 8.3% 45.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 70.8% 29.2% 0.0%
1989Playoffs8 62.5% 25.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 50.0%
1987Fase a gironi24 45.8% 16.7% 37.5%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  54.2% 45.8% 79.2% 20.8% 10.0%
1987Playoffs8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 87.5% 12.5% 50.0%
1985Fase a gironi24 29.2% 29.2% 41.7%  ¦  41.2% 58.8%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 75.0% 25.0% -17.6%
1985Playoffs8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1983Fase a gironi24 50.0% 16.7% 33.3%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 79.2% 20.8% 20.0%
1983Playoffs8 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% -25.0%
1981Fase a gironi24 29.2% 33.3% 37.5%  ¦  43.8% 56.3%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 66.7% 33.3% -12.5%
1981Playoffs8 62.5% 12.5% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1979Fase a gironi24 45.8% 16.7% 37.5%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 66.7% 33.3% 10.0%
1979Playoffs8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1977Fase a gironi24 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 70.8% 29.2% 11.1%
1977Playoffs4 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%

Clicca su ogni colonna per ordinare in ordine decrescente
Percentuali mouseover (%) per vedere le probabilità di valore

AnnaBet Classifiche sulla forza

Aggiornato 2025-04-21 11:25:15
#Squadra Rating
1. Brasile U20 1360
2. Spagna U20 1336
3. Argentina U20 1308
4. Germania U20 1278
5. Australia U20 1278
6. Costa Rica U20 1238
7. Giappone U20 1182
8. Honduras U20 1134
9. Portogallo U20 1133
10. Siria U20 1123
11. Cameroon U20 1121
12. Russia U20 1088
13. Paesi Bassi U20 1087
14. Qatar U20 1073
15. Cile U20 1028
16. Burundi U20 955


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings		 Higher
Rated		 Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.