| # |
Mannschaft |
SP |
S |
SV |
NV |
N |
T+ |
T- |
Diff |
P |
P/M |
S% |
ØT+ |
ØT- |
| 1. | EHC Munich |
56 |
36 |
6 |
2 |
12 |
205 |
132 |
+73 |
122 |
2.18 |
75% |
3.55 |
2.32 |
| 2. | ERC Ingolstadt |
56 |
29 |
5 |
6 |
16 |
182 |
142 |
+40 |
103 |
1.84 |
61% |
3.16 |
2.43 |
| 3. | Adler Mannheim |
56 |
24 |
10 |
7 |
15 |
162 |
136 |
+26 |
99 |
1.77 |
61% |
2.71 |
2.30 |
| 4. | Straubing Tigers |
56 |
25 |
9 |
5 |
17 |
190 |
166 |
+24 |
98 |
1.75 |
61% |
3.23 |
2.88 |
| 5. | EHC Wolfsburg |
56 |
24 |
6 |
9 |
17 |
172 |
150 |
+22 |
93 |
1.66 |
54% |
2.96 |
2.52 |
| 6. | Kölner Haie |
56 |
25 |
7 |
3 |
21 |
197 |
153 |
+44 |
92 |
1.64 |
57% |
3.39 |
2.68 |
| 7. | Düsseldorfer EG |
56 |
22 |
10 |
5 |
19 |
150 |
137 |
+13 |
91 |
1.62 |
57% |
2.50 |
2.36 |
| 8. | Bremerhaven |
56 |
22 |
6 |
9 |
19 |
153 |
144 |
+9 |
87 |
1.55 |
50% |
2.62 |
2.41 |
| 9. | Nürnberg Ice Tigers |
56 |
22 |
5 |
5 |
24 |
162 |
186 |
-24 |
81 |
1.45 |
48% |
2.80 |
3.23 |
| 10. | Frankfurt Lions |
56 |
19 |
6 |
10 |
21 |
163 |
174 |
-11 |
79 |
1.41 |
45% |
2.80 |
2.93 |
| 11. | Eisbären Berlin |
56 |
18 |
6 |
10 |
22 |
160 |
171 |
-11 |
76 |
1.36 |
43% |
2.75 |
2.88 |
| 12. | SERC Wild Wings |
56 |
19 |
5 |
8 |
24 |
144 |
151 |
-7 |
75 |
1.34 |
43% |
2.48 |
2.55 |
| 13. | Iserlohn Roosters |
56 |
19 |
5 |
6 |
26 |
149 |
192 |
-43 |
73 |
1.30 |
43% |
2.57 |
3.32 |
| 14. | Augsburger Panther |
56 |
11 |
5 |
8 |
32 |
138 |
193 |
-55 |
51 |
0.91 |
29% |
2.38 |
3.30 |
| 15. | Bietigheim |
56 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
38 |
125 |
225 |
-100 |
40 |
0.71 |
25% |
2.12 |
3.95 |
| # |
Mannschaft |
SP |
S |
SV |
NV |
N |
T+ |
T- |
Diff |
P |
P/M |
S% |
ØT+ |
ØT- |
| 1. | Straubing Tigers |
28 |
17 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
106 |
65 |
+41 |
65 |
2.32 |
82% |
3.57 |
2.25 |
| 2. | EHC Munich |
28 |
17 |
3 |
1 |
7 |
105 |
70 |
+35 |
58 |
2.07 |
71% |
3.64 |
2.46 |
| 3. | ERC Ingolstadt |
28 |
18 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
98 |
66 |
+32 |
58 |
2.07 |
68% |
3.46 |
2.29 |
| 4. | Bremerhaven |
28 |
13 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
82 |
60 |
+22 |
54 |
1.93 |
64% |
2.75 |
1.96 |
| 5. | Kölner Haie |
28 |
15 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
108 |
67 |
+41 |
53 |
1.89 |
64% |
3.75 |
2.32 |
| 6. | Adler Mannheim |
28 |
14 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
83 |
65 |
+18 |
53 |
1.89 |
64% |
2.82 |
2.21 |
| 7. | Nürnberg Ice Tigers |
28 |
17 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
92 |
80 |
+12 |
53 |
1.89 |
61% |
3.29 |
2.79 |
| 8. | EHC Wolfsburg |
28 |
15 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
93 |
72 |
+21 |
52 |
1.86 |
61% |
3.25 |
2.46 |
| 9. | Düsseldorfer EG |
28 |
12 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
73 |
60 |
+13 |
49 |
1.75 |
61% |
2.43 |
2.04 |
| 10. | Iserlohn Roosters |
28 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
10 |
80 |
87 |
-7 |
46 |
1.64 |
57% |
2.71 |
3.04 |
| 11. | Eisbären Berlin |
28 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
86 |
80 |
+6 |
43 |
1.54 |
50% |
2.89 |
2.64 |
| 12. | Frankfurt Lions |
28 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
85 |
91 |
-6 |
41 |
1.46 |
46% |
2.89 |
3.04 |
| 13. | SERC Wild Wings |
28 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
68 |
71 |
-3 |
33 |
1.18 |
36% |
2.36 |
2.36 |
| 14. | Augsburger Panther |
28 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
16 |
78 |
96 |
-18 |
31 |
1.11 |
39% |
2.68 |
3.39 |
| 15. | Bietigheim |
28 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
15 |
77 |
108 |
-31 |
28 |
1.00 |
32% |
2.64 |
3.71 |
| # |
Mannschaft |
SP |
S |
SV |
NV |
N |
T+ |
T- |
Diff |
P |
P/M |
S% |
ØT+ |
ØT- |
| 1. | EHC Munich |
28 |
19 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
100 |
62 |
+38 |
64 |
2.29 |
79% |
3.46 |
2.18 |
| 2. | Adler Mannheim |
28 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
79 |
71 |
+8 |
46 |
1.64 |
57% |
2.61 |
2.39 |
| 3. | ERC Ingolstadt |
28 |
11 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
84 |
76 |
+8 |
45 |
1.61 |
54% |
2.86 |
2.57 |
| 4. | Düsseldorfer EG |
28 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
77 |
77 |
0 |
42 |
1.50 |
54% |
2.57 |
2.68 |
| 5. | SERC Wild Wings |
28 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
76 |
80 |
-4 |
42 |
1.50 |
50% |
2.61 |
2.75 |
| 6. | EHC Wolfsburg |
28 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
79 |
78 |
+1 |
41 |
1.46 |
46% |
2.68 |
2.57 |
| 7. | Kölner Haie |
28 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
13 |
89 |
86 |
+3 |
39 |
1.39 |
50% |
3.04 |
3.04 |
| 8. | Frankfurt Lions |
28 |
10 |
2 |
4 |
12 |
78 |
83 |
-5 |
38 |
1.36 |
43% |
2.71 |
2.82 |
| 9. | Bremerhaven |
28 |
9 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
71 |
84 |
-13 |
33 |
1.18 |
36% |
2.50 |
2.86 |
| 10. | Straubing Tigers |
28 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
84 |
101 |
-17 |
33 |
1.18 |
39% |
2.89 |
3.50 |
| 11. | Eisbären Berlin |
28 |
9 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
74 |
91 |
-17 |
33 |
1.18 |
36% |
2.61 |
3.11 |
| 12. | Nürnberg Ice Tigers |
28 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
15 |
70 |
106 |
-36 |
28 |
1.00 |
36% |
2.32 |
3.68 |
| 13. | Iserlohn Roosters |
28 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
16 |
69 |
105 |
-36 |
27 |
0.96 |
29% |
2.43 |
3.61 |
| 14. | Augsburger Panther |
28 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
16 |
60 |
97 |
-37 |
20 |
0.71 |
18% |
2.07 |
3.21 |
| 15. | Bietigheim |
28 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
23 |
48 |
117 |
-69 |
12 |
0.43 |
18% |
1.61 |
4.18 |
Ein Klick auf den Titel organisiert die Tabelle nach der betreffenden Spalte
Stelle den Cursor über die Prozentzahl (%) um Quotengrenze zu sehen | Wähle Saison
Die offizielle Webseite
Wikipedia
|
Languages 
English/ROW 
Español 
Deutsch 
Italiano 
Русский 
Українська 
Polski 
Slovenščina 
Svenska 
Česky 
Slovenský 
Suomi 
Registrieren 
Olympischen Spielen
International
Australia
Dänemark
Frankreich
Großbritannien
Kanada
Kasachstan
Latvia
Norwegen
Österreich
Schweiz
Ungarn
Weißrussland