AnnaBet.com
Bienvenidos Visitante   Entrada   Registrarse Por favor, registrarse o iniciar sesión.
Tienda Online    Facebook   Twitter   Contacte con nosotros

Fútbol

Inglaterra Italia España Alemania Francia Países Bajos Bélgica Portugal Escocia Rusia
Internacional Albania Arabia Saudita Argelia Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaiyán Bahrain Belarús Bolivia Bosnia y Herzegovina Brasil Bulgaria Canadá Chile China Chipre Colombia Corea del Sur Costa Rica Croacia Dinamarca EE.UU. Ecuador Egipto El Salvador Eslovaquia Eslovenia Estonia Finlandia Gales Georgia Grecia Guatemala Honduras Hong Kong Hungría Indonesia Iran Iraq Irlanda del Norte Islandia Islas Feroe Israel Jamaica Japón Jordania Kazajstán Kenia Kuwait La India Letonia Lituania Luxemburgo Malasia Malta Marruecos México Moldova Montenegro Nicaragua North Macedonia Noruega Nueva Zelanda Paraguay Peru Polonia Qatar República Checa República de Irlanda Rumania San Marino Serbia Singapur Siria Sudáfrica Suecia Suiza Tailandia Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Tunisia Turkmenistan Turquía Ucrania Uganda United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam

  Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 2003 @ United Arab Emirates

Group A

# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. Burkina Faso U20 3 2 1 0 2 0 +2 7 2.33 67% 0.67 0.00
2. Eslovaquia U20 3 2 0 1 5 2 +3 6 2.00 67% 1.67 0.67
3. Emiratos Árabes Unid 3 1 1 1 3 5 -2 4 1.33 33% 1.00 1.67
4. Panama U20 3 0 0 3 1 4 -3 0 0.00 0% 0.33 1.33

Group B
# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. Argentina U20 3 3 0 0 7 3 +4 9 3.00 100% 2.33 1.00
2. España U20 3 2 0 1 4 2 +2 6 2.00 67% 1.33 0.67
3. Mali U20 3 1 0 2 4 7 -3 3 1.00 33% 1.33 2.33
4. Uzbekistan U20 3 0 0 3 3 6 -3 0 0.00 0% 1.00 2.00

Group C
# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. Australia U20 3 2 1 0 6 4 +2 7 2.33 67% 2.00 1.33
2. Brasil U20 3 1 1 1 5 4 +1 4 1.33 33% 1.67 1.33
3. Canadá U20 3 1 0 2 2 4 -2 3 1.00 33% 0.67 1.33
4. República Checa U20 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00

Group D
# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. Japón U20 3 2 0 1 3 4 -1 6 2.00 67% 1.00 1.33
2. Colombia U20 3 1 2 0 4 1 +3 5 1.67 33% 1.33 0.33
3. Egipto U20 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 1.33 33% 0.33 0.33
4. Inglaterra U20 3 0 1 2 0 2 -2 1 0.33 0% 0.00 0.67

Group E
# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. Irlanda U20 3 2 1 0 6 3 +3 7 2.33 67% 2.00 1.00
2. Costa de Marfil U20 3 1 2 0 4 3 +1 5 1.67 33% 1.33 1.00
3. Arabia Saudita U20 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00
4. México U20 3 0 1 2 2 5 -3 1 0.33 0% 0.67 1.67

Group F
# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. EE.UU. U20 3 2 0 1 6 4 +2 6 2.00 67% 2.00 1.33
2. Paraguay U20 3 2 0 1 4 3 +1 6 2.00 67% 1.33 1.00
3. Corea del Sur U20 3 1 0 2 2 3 -1 3 1.00 33% 0.67 1.00
4. Alemania U20 3 1 0 2 3 5 -2 3 1.00 33% 1.00 1.67


Haga clic en cualquier columna para ordenar la tabla
Porcentajes mouseover (%) para ver las probabilidades de valor

Seleccione una temporada

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Sitio web oficial

Wikipedia

Viernes 19. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Playoffs - Bronze2003 Cuotas 1x2
Colombia U20    2 - 1    Argentina U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Playoffs - Finals2003 Cuotas 1x2
España U20    0 - 1    Brasil U20
   
Lunes 15. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals2003 Cuotas 1x2
Brasil U20    1 - 0    Argentina U20
España U20    1 - 0    Colombia U20
   
Viernes 12. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals2003 Cuotas 1x2
Canadá U20    1 - 2 t.s. España U20
Colombia U20    1 - 0    Emiratos Árabes Unidos
Japón U20    1 - 5    Brasil U20
EE.UU. U20    1 - 2 t.s. Argentina U20
   
Martes 9. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Playoffs - 1/8 Finals2003 Cuotas 1x2
Australia U20    0 - 1    Emiratos Árabes Unidos
Brasil U20    2 - 1 t.s. Eslovaquia U20
Irlanda U20    2 - 3 t.s. Colombia U20
Paraguay U20    0 - 1    España U20
   
Lunes 8. diciembre 2003
   
Argentina U20    2 - 1 t.s. Egipto U20
Burkina Faso U20    0 - 1    Canadá U20
Japón U20    2 - 1 t.s. Corea del Sur U20
EE.UU. U20    2 - 0    Costa de Marfil U20
   
Viernes 5. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group D2003 Cuotas 1x2
Colombia U20    0 - 0    Inglaterra U20
Egipto U20    0 - 1    Japón U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group E2003 Cuotas 1x2
Irlanda U20    2 - 0    México U20
Arabia Saudita U20    0 - 0    Costa de Marfil U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group F2003 Cuotas 1x2
Paraguay U20    2 - 0    Alemania U20
EE.UU. U20    2 - 0    Corea del Sur U20
   
Jueves 4. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group A2003 Cuotas 1x2
Eslovaquia U20    1 - 0    Panama U20
Emiratos Árabes Unidos    0 - 0    Burkina Faso U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group B2003 Cuotas 1x2
Argentina U20    3 - 1    Mali U20
España U20    1 - 0    Uzbekistan U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group C2003 Cuotas 1x2
Brasil U20    2 - 3    Australia U20
Canadá U20    1 - 0    República Checa U20
   
Martes 2. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group D2003 Cuotas 1x2
Inglaterra U20    0 - 1    Egipto U20
Japón U20    1 - 4    Colombia U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group E2003 Cuotas 1x2
Costa de Marfil U20    2 - 2    Irlanda U20
México U20    1 - 1    Arabia Saudita U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group F2003 Cuotas 1x2
Alemania U20    3 - 1    EE.UU. U20
Corea del Sur U20    0 - 1    Paraguay U20
   
Lunes 1. diciembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group A2003 Cuotas 1x2
Burkina Faso U20    1 - 0    Eslovaquia U20
Panama U20    1 - 2    Emiratos Árabes Unidos
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group B2003 Cuotas 1x2
Mali U20    0 - 2    España U20
Uzbekistan U20    1 - 2    Argentina U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group C2003 Cuotas 1x2
Australia U20    2 - 1    Canadá U20
República Checa U20    1 - 1    Brasil U20
   
Sábado 29. noviembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group D2003 Cuotas 1x2
Colombia U20    0 - 0    Egipto U20
Japón U20    1 - 0    Inglaterra U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group E2003 Cuotas 1x2
México U20    1 - 2    Costa de Marfil U20
Arabia Saudita U20    1 - 2    Irlanda U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group F2003 Cuotas 1x2
Paraguay U20    1 - 3    EE.UU. U20
Corea del Sur U20    2 - 0    Alemania U20
   
Viernes 28. noviembre 2003
   
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group A2003 Cuotas 1x2
Panama U20    0 - 1    Burkina Faso U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group B2003 Cuotas 1x2
Argentina U20    2 - 1    España U20
Uzbekistan U20    2 - 3    Mali U20
Copa Mundial de Fútbol Sub-20 - Group C2003 Cuotas 1x2
Brasil U20    2 - 0    Canadá U20

Más resultados

diciembre 2003
noviembre 2003

Alemania U20
Arabia Saudita U20
Argentina U20
Australia U20
Brasil U20
Burkina Faso U20
Canadá U20
Colombia U20
Corea del Sur U20
Costa de Marfil U2
EE.UU. U20
Egipto U20
Emiratos Árabes Un
Eslovaquia U20
España U20
Inglaterra U20
Irlanda U20
Japón U20
Mali U20
México U20
Panama U20
Paraguay U20
República Checa U2
Uzbekistan U20

Seleccione una temporada

2023
2019
2017
2015
2013
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977

Sitio web oficial

Wikipedia

# Equipo PJ PG PE PP GF GC DG PT Pts/G PG% ØGF ØGC
1. España U20 6 4 0 1 7 2 +5 12 2.00 83% 1.00 0.33
2. Brasil U20 6 3 1 1 12 6 +6 10 1.67 67% 1.83 1.00
3. Colombia U20 6 3 1 1 10 5 +5 10 1.67 67% 1.50 0.83
4. EE.UU. U20 5 3 0 1 9 6 +3 9 1.80 60% 1.80 1.00
5. Irlanda U20 4 2 1 0 8 6 +2 7 1.75 50% 2.00 1.25
6. Australia U20 4 2 1 1 6 5 +1 7 1.75 50% 1.50 1.25
7. Burkina Faso U20 4 2 1 1 2 1 +1 7 1.75 50% 0.50 0.25
8. Emiratos Árabes Unid 5 2 1 2 4 6 -2 7 1.40 40% 0.80 1.20
9. Argentina U20 6 2 0 2 10 7 +3 6 1.00 67% 1.33 1.17
10. Eslovaquia U20 4 2 0 1 6 4 +2 6 1.50 50% 1.50 0.75
11. Paraguay U20 4 2 0 2 4 4 0 6 1.50 50% 1.00 1.00
12. Canadá U20 5 2 0 2 4 6 -2 6 1.20 40% 0.80 1.00
13. Japón U20 5 2 0 2 6 10 -4 6 1.20 60% 1.00 2.00
14. Costa de Marfil U20 4 1 2 1 4 5 -1 5 1.25 25% 1.00 1.25
15. Egipto U20 4 1 1 1 2 3 -1 4 1.00 25% 0.50 0.50
16. Corea del Sur U20 4 1 0 2 3 5 -2 3 0.75 25% 0.75 1.00
17. Alemania U20 3 1 0 2 3 5 -2 3 1.00 33% 1.00 1.67
18. Mali U20 3 1 0 2 4 7 -3 3 1.00 33% 1.33 2.33
19. Arabia Saudita U20 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00
20. República Checa U20 3 0 2 1 2 3 -1 2 0.67 0% 0.67 1.00
21. Inglaterra U20 3 0 1 2 0 2 -2 1 0.33 0% 0.00 0.67
22. México U20 3 0 1 2 2 5 -3 1 0.33 0% 0.67 1.67
23. Uzbekistan U20 3 0 0 3 3 6 -3 0 0.00 0% 1.00 2.00
24. Panama U20 3 0 0 3 1 4 -3 0 0.00 0% 0.33 1.33

-
Temporada Juegos 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Más 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más 1.5 Menos de 1.5 Ventaja en casa
2023Fase de Grupos36 38.9% 16.7% 44.4%  ¦  46.7% 53.3%  ¦  63.9% 36.1% 80.6% 19.4% -6.7%
2023Playoffs16 43.8% 12.5% 43.8%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 68.8% 31.3% 12.5%
2019Fase de Grupos36 36.1% 16.7% 47.2%  ¦  43.3% 56.7%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 77.8% 22.2% -13.3%
2019Playoffs16 37.5% 25.0% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 62.5% 37.5% 0.0%
2017Fase de Grupos36 44.4% 25.0% 30.6%  ¦  59.3% 40.7%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 72.2% 27.8% 18.5%
2017Playoffs16 25.0% 43.8% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 56.3% 43.8% 0.0%
2015Fase de Grupos36 36.1% 16.7% 47.2%  ¦  43.3% 56.7%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 86.1% 13.9% -13.3%
2015Playoffs16 25.0% 50.0% 25.0%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 12.5%
2013Fase de Grupos36 30.6% 25.0% 44.4%  ¦  40.7% 59.3%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 83.3% 16.7% -18.5%
2013Playoffs16 31.3% 43.8% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 81.3% 18.8% 25.0%
2011Fase de Grupos36 47.2% 25.0% 27.8%  ¦  63.0% 37.0%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 66.7% 33.3% 25.9%
2011Playoffs16 56.3% 37.5% 6.3%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 68.8% 31.3% 75.0%
2009Fase de Grupos36 47.2% 19.4% 33.3%  ¦  58.6% 41.4%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 83.3% 16.7% 17.2%
2009Playoffs16 25.0% 43.8% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  43.8% 56.3% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
2007Fase de Grupos36 36.1% 27.8% 36.1%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 69.4% 30.6% 0.0%
2007Playoffs16 31.3% 37.5% 31.3%  ¦  56.3% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 68.8% 31.3% 12.5%
2005Fase de Grupos36 47.2% 19.4% 33.3%  ¦  58.6% 41.4%  ¦  47.2% 52.8% 75.0% 25.0% 17.2%
2005Playoffs16 50.0% 18.8% 31.3%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  68.8% 31.3% 81.3% 18.8% 25.0%
2003Fase de Grupos36 38.9% 22.2% 38.9%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  38.9% 61.1% 63.9% 36.1% 0.0%
2003Playoffs16 31.3% 37.5% 31.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  18.8% 81.3% 56.3% 43.8% 0.0%
2001Fase de Grupos36 27.8% 22.2% 50.0%  ¦  35.7% 64.3%  ¦  52.8% 47.2% 75.0% 25.0% -28.6%
2001Playoffs16 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 81.3% 18.8% 0.0%
1999Fase de Grupos36 47.2% 16.7% 36.1%  ¦  56.7% 43.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4% 75.0% 25.0% 13.3%
1999Playoffs16 43.8% 31.3% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 93.8% 6.3% 25.0%
1997Fase de Grupos36 27.8% 25.0% 47.2%  ¦  37.0% 63.0%  ¦  61.1% 38.9% 80.6% 19.4% -25.9%
1997Playoffs16 31.3% 25.0% 43.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  43.8% 56.3% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
1995Fase de Grupos24 29.2% 25.0% 45.8%  ¦  38.9% 61.1%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 83.3% 16.7% -22.2%
1995Playoffs8 50.0% 12.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 87.5% 12.5% 25.0%
1993Fase de Grupos24 33.3% 29.2% 37.5%  ¦  47.1% 52.9%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 79.2% 20.8% -5.9%
1993Playoffs8 37.5% 25.0% 37.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
1991Fase de Grupos24 41.7% 29.2% 29.2%  ¦  58.8% 41.2%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 62.5% 37.5% 17.6%
1991Playoffs8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 75.0% 25.0% 50.0%
1989Fase de Grupos24 45.8% 8.3% 45.8%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 70.8% 29.2% 0.0%
1989Playoffs8 62.5% 25.0% 12.5%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 50.0%
1987Fase de Grupos24 45.8% 16.7% 37.5%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  54.2% 45.8% 79.2% 20.8% 10.0%
1987Playoffs8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 87.5% 12.5% 50.0%
1985Fase de Grupos24 29.2% 29.2% 41.7%  ¦  41.2% 58.8%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 75.0% 25.0% -17.6%
1985Playoffs8 37.5% 37.5% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1983Fase de Grupos24 50.0% 16.7% 33.3%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 79.2% 20.8% 20.0%
1983Playoffs8 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%  ¦  37.5% 62.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% -25.0%
1981Fase de Grupos24 29.2% 33.3% 37.5%  ¦  43.8% 56.3%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 66.7% 33.3% -12.5%
1981Playoffs8 62.5% 12.5% 25.0%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1979Fase de Grupos24 45.8% 16.7% 37.5%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 66.7% 33.3% 10.0%
1979Playoffs8 37.5% 50.0% 12.5%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  37.5% 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 25.0%
1977Fase de Grupos24 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%  ¦  55.6% 44.4%  ¦  41.7% 58.3% 70.8% 29.2% 11.1%
1977Playoffs4 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%

Haga clic en cualquier columna para ordenar la tabla
Porcentajes mouseover (%) para ver las probabilidades de valor

AnnaBet Power Ratings

Actualizado 2025-03-20 11:50:37
#Equipo Rating
1. EE.UU. U20 1436
2. Brasil U20 1361
3. Colombia U20 1343
4. España U20 1334
5. Inglaterra U20 1333
6. Corea del Sur U20 1323
7. Argentina U20 1312
8. Alemania U20 1277
9. Australia U20 1277
10. Panama U20 1265
11. Burkina Faso U20 1212
12. México U20 1210
13. Egipto U20 1174
14. Uzbekistan U20 1174
15. Paraguay U20 1162
16. Arabia Saudita U20 1156
17. Japón U20 1156
18. Mali U20 1154
19. Canadá U20 1151
20. Costa de Marfil U20 1147
21. Eslovaquia U20 1091
22. República Checa U20 1079
23. Irlanda U20 1050
24. Emiratos Árabes Unidos U20 1036


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings		 Higher
Rated		 Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.