AnnaBet.com
Vítejte hoste   Přihlásit   Register Prosím zaregistrujte se nebo přihláste
Web Store    Facebook   Twitter   Zkontaktujte nás

Hokej

           USA Rusko Finsko Švédsko
Medzinárodní Austrálie Bělorusko Česko Dánsko Francie Itálie Kanada Kazachstán Lotyšsko Maďarsko Německo Norsko Polsko Rakousko Slovensko Slovinsko Španělsko Švýcarsko Velká Británie

  MS U20 2016 @ Finsko

Group A

# Tým Z V OTW OTL P VG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØVG ØOG
1. Švédsko U20 4 4 0 0 0 19 5 +14 12 3.00 100% 4.75 1.25
2. USA U20 4 3 0 0 1 18 5 +13 9 2.25 75% 4.50 1.25
3. Kanada U20 4 1 1 0 2 13 12 +1 5 1.25 50% 3.00 3.00
4. Dánsko U20 4 1 0 0 3 4 16 -12 3 0.75 25% 1.00 4.00
5. Švýcarsko U20 4 0 0 1 3 7 23 -16 1 0.25 0% 1.75 5.50

Group B
# Tým Z V OTW OTL P VG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØVG ØOG
1. Rusko U20 4 3 1 0 0 14 7 +7 11 2.75 100% 3.25 1.75
2. Finsko U20 4 3 0 0 1 23 13 +10 9 2.25 75% 5.75 3.25
3. Česko U20 4 2 0 1 1 12 10 +2 7 1.75 50% 3.00 2.25
4. Slovensko U20 4 1 0 0 3 8 14 -6 3 0.75 25% 2.00 3.50
5. Bělorusko U20 4 0 0 0 4 6 19 -13 0 0.00 0% 1.50 4.75


Klikněte na vybraný sloupec, aby ste seřadili tabulku
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

Vybrát sezónu


2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


Oficiální stránka

Wikipedia

Úterý 5. leden 2016
   
MS U20 - Playoffs - Finals2016 Kurzy 1x2
Rusko U20    3 - 4 pp Finsko U202.674.522.07
MS U20 - Playoffs - Bronze2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švédsko U20    3 - 8    USA U202.304.532.40
   
Pondělí 4. leden 2016
   
MS U20 - Playoffs - 1/2 Finals2016 Kurzy 1x2
Rusko U20    2 - 1    USA U203.995.301.59
Švédsko U20    1 - 2    Finsko U201.934.842.90
   
Neděle 3. leden 2015
   
MS U20 - Relegation2016 Kurzy 1x2
Bělorusko U20    2 - 6    Švýcarsko U206.296.461.32
   
Sobota 2. leden 2015
   
MS U20 - Playoffs - 1/4 Finals2016 Kurzy 1x2
USA U20    7 - 0    Česko U201.326.546.35
Finsko U20    6 - 5    Kanada U202.424.612.27
Švédsko U20    6 - 0    Slovensko U201.129.5212.90
Rusko U20    4 - 3 pp Dánsko U201.0316.4124.73
MS U20 - Relegation2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švýcarsko U20    5 - 1    Bělorusko U201.435.845.07
   
Čtvrtek 31. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Kanada U20    2 - 5    Švédsko U201.984.792.78
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Finsko U20    5 - 4    Česko U201.594.924.16
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Dánsko U20    1 - 4    USA U2025.9018.101.01
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Rusko U20    2 - 1    Slovensko U201.226.868.31
   
Středa 30. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
USA U20    10 - 1    Švýcarsko U201.109.9513.66
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Slovensko U20    3 - 8    Finsko U2011.098.351.15
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švédsko U20    5 - 0    Dánsko U201.0217.1623.78
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Česko U20    5 - 3    Bělorusko U201.0711.4216.25
   
Úterý 29. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švýcarsko U20    2 - 3 pen Kanada U2016.3011.631.07
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Bělorusko U20    1 - 4    Rusko U2023.6317.541.02
   
Pondělí 28. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Kanada U20    6 - 1    Dánsko U201.0019.6331.45
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Rusko U20    6 - 4    Finsko U202.744.492.06
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švédsko U20    1 - 0    USA U202.514.832.13
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Slovensko U20    0 - 2    Česko U205.966.251.35
   
Neděle 27. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Dánsko U20    2 - 1    Švýcarsko U206.596.891.29
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Bělorusko U20    2 - 4    Slovensko U205.225.891.40
   
Sobota 26. prosinec 2015
   
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
USA U20    4 - 2    Kanada U202.894.711.96
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Finsko U20    6 - 0    Bělorusko U201.0413.5020.66
MS U20 - Group A2016 Kurzy 1x2
Švýcarsko U20    3 - 8    Švédsko U207.397.121.25
MS U20 - Group B2016 Kurzy 1x2
Česko U20    1 - 2 pen Rusko U204.254.891.57

Více výsledků


leden 2016
prosinec 2015

Bělorusko U20
Česko U20
Dánsko U20
Finsko U20
Kanada U20
Rusko U20
Slovensko U20
Švédsko U20
Švýcarsko U20
USA U20


Vybrát sezónu


2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


Oficiální stránka

Wikipedia

# Tým Z V OTW OTL P VG OG Diff B B/Z V% ØVG ØOG
1. Rusko U20 6 4 1 1 0 21 14 +7 15 2.50 83% 3.33 2.17
2. Finsko U20 6 4 1 0 1 29 22 +7 14 2.33 83% 4.67 3.67
3. USA U20 6 4 0 0 2 30 8 +22 12 2.00 67% 5.00 1.33
4. Švédsko U20 6 4 0 0 2 21 12 +9 12 2.00 67% 3.50 2.00
5. Česko U20 5 2 0 1 2 12 17 -5 7 1.40 40% 2.40 3.20
6. Švýcarsko U20 6 2 0 1 3 18 26 -8 7 1.17 33% 3.00 4.17
7. Kanada U20 5 1 1 0 3 18 18 0 5 1.00 40% 3.40 3.60
8. Dánsko U20 5 1 0 1 3 7 20 -13 4 0.80 20% 1.40 3.80
9. Slovensko U20 5 1 0 0 4 8 20 -12 3 0.60 20% 1.60 4.00
10. Bělorusko U20 6 0 0 0 6 9 30 -21 0 0.00 0% 1.50 5.00

-
Sezóna Zápasů 1 x 2  ¦  1 2  ¦  Víc než 5.5 Méně než 5.5 Víc než 4.5 Méně než 4.5 Výhoda domácích
2025Group Stage20 35.0% 20.0% 45.0%  ¦  45.0% 55.0%  ¦  60.0% 40.0% 65.0% 35.0% -10.0%
2025Relegation9 66.7% 33.3% 0.0%  ¦  77.8% 22.2%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 88.9% 11.1% 55.6%
2024Group Stage20 40.0% 10.0% 50.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 85.0% 15.0% -20.0%
2024Playoff9 55.6% 33.3% 11.1%  ¦  77.8% 22.2%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 88.9% 11.1% 55.6%
2023Group Stage20 55.0% 20.0% 25.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0% 70.0% 30.0% 40.0%
2023Relegation10 30.0% 40.0% 30.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0% 80.0% 20.0% 0.0%
2022Group Stage20 55.0% 10.0% 35.0%  ¦  65.0% 35.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 95.0% 5.0% 30.0%
2022Expunged17 52.9% 11.8% 35.3%  ¦  64.7% 35.3%  ¦  52.9% 47.1% 58.8% 41.2% 29.4%
2021Group Stage20 50.0% 10.0% 40.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  65.0% 35.0% 75.0% 25.0% 10.0%
2021Playoff8 87.5% 0.0% 12.5%  ¦  87.5% 12.5%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 62.5% 37.5% 75.0%
2020Group Stage20 50.0% 10.0% 40.0%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 85.0% 15.0% 20.0%
2020Relegation11 72.7% 9.1% 18.2%  ¦  72.7% 27.3%  ¦  36.4% 63.6% 72.7% 27.3% 45.5%
2019Group Stage20 40.0% 10.0% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 0.0%
2019Playoff10 50.0% 10.0% 40.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
2018Group Stage20 55.0% 10.0% 35.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 95.0% 5.0% 10.0%
2018Playoff10 50.0% 20.0% 30.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0% 80.0% 20.0% 40.0%
2017Group Stage20 55.0% 15.0% 30.0%  ¦  65.0% 35.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0% 70.0% 30.0% 30.0%
2017Relegation10 40.0% 30.0% 30.0%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 70.0% 30.0% 20.0%
2016Group Stage20 55.0% 10.0% 35.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0% 70.0% 30.0% 10.0%
2016Relegation10 50.0% 20.0% 30.0%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  80.0% 20.0% 80.0% 20.0% 20.0%
2015Group Stage20 40.0% 20.0% 40.0%  ¦  45.0% 55.0%  ¦  55.0% 45.0% 70.0% 30.0% -10.0%
2015Relegation10 60.0% 0.0% 40.0%  ¦  60.0% 40.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0% 90.0% 10.0% 20.0%
2014Group Stage20 40.0% 10.0% 50.0%  ¦  40.0% 60.0%  ¦  70.0% 30.0% 95.0% 5.0% -20.0%
2014Playoff11 45.5% 9.1% 45.5%  ¦  45.5% 54.5%  ¦  45.5% 54.5% 54.5% 45.5% -9.1%
2013Group Stage24 50.0% 20.8% 29.2%  ¦  62.5% 37.5%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 75.0% 25.0% 25.0%
2013Playoff7 14.3% 42.9% 42.9%  ¦  42.9% 57.1%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 71.4% 28.6% -14.3%
2012Group Stage24 41.7% 16.7% 41.7%  ¦  54.2% 45.8%  ¦  62.5% 37.5% 75.0% 25.0% 8.3%
2012Playoff7 42.9% 42.9% 14.3%  ¦  85.7% 14.3%  ¦  42.9% 57.1% 42.9% 57.1% 71.4%
2011Group Stage24 50.0% 12.5% 37.5%  ¦  54.2% 45.8%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 66.7% 33.3% 8.3%
2011Playoff7 14.3% 42.9% 42.9%  ¦  14.3% 85.7%  ¦  57.1% 42.9% 85.7% 14.3% -71.4%
2010Group Stage24 58.3% 4.2% 37.5%  ¦  58.3% 41.7%  ¦  79.2% 20.8% 91.7% 8.3% 16.7%
2010Playoff7 42.9% 28.6% 28.6%  ¦  42.9% 57.1%  ¦  85.7% 14.3% 85.7% 14.3% -14.3%
2009Group Stage24 62.5% 4.2% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 83.3% 16.7% 33.3%
2009Playoff7 57.1% 28.6% 14.3%  ¦  85.7% 14.3%  ¦  85.7% 14.3% 85.7% 14.3% 71.4%
2008Group Stage24 45.8% 4.2% 50.0%  ¦  50.0% 50.0%  ¦  75.0% 25.0% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0%
2008Playoff7 42.9% 28.6% 28.6%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  42.9% 57.1% 71.4% 28.6% 14.3%
2007Group Stage24 50.0% 8.3% 41.7%  ¦  58.3% 41.7%  ¦  45.8% 54.2% 58.3% 41.7% 16.7%
2007Playoff7 42.9% 14.3% 42.9%  ¦  42.9% 57.1%  ¦  71.4% 28.6% 71.4% 28.6% -14.3%
2006Group Stage24 62.5% 8.3% 29.2%  ¦  68.2% 31.8%  ¦  66.7% 33.3% 79.2% 20.8% 36.4%
2006Playoff7 71.4% 14.3% 14.3%  ¦  71.4% 28.6%  ¦  28.6% 71.4% 42.9% 57.1% 42.9%
2005Group Stage24 41.7% 0.0% 58.3%  ¦  41.7% 58.3%  ¦  58.3% 41.7% 83.3% 16.7% -16.7%
2005Playoff7 42.9% 28.6% 28.6%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  57.1% 42.9% 57.1% 42.9% 14.3%
2004Group Stage24 58.3% 8.3% 33.3%  ¦  63.6% 36.4%  ¦  54.2% 45.8% 66.7% 33.3% 27.3%
2004Playoff7 57.1% 0.0% 42.9%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  57.1% 42.9% 71.4% 28.6% 14.3%
2003Group Stage24 54.2% 4.2% 41.7%  ¦  56.5% 43.5%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 58.3% 41.7% 13.0%
2003Playoff7 57.1% 0.0% 42.9%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  28.6% 71.4% 85.7% 14.3% 14.3%
2002Group Stage20 55.0% 15.0% 30.0%  ¦  64.7% 35.3%  ¦  50.0% 50.0% 60.0% 40.0% 29.4%
2002Playoff14 28.6% 21.4% 50.0%  ¦  42.9% 57.1%  ¦  42.9% 57.1% 64.3% 35.7% -14.3%
2001Playoff12 50.0% 16.7% 33.3%  ¦  66.7% 33.3%  ¦  25.0% 75.0% 50.0% 50.0% 33.3%
2001Group Stage2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%  ¦  0.0% 100.0%  ¦  100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% -100.0%
2000Playoff14 50.0% 14.3% 35.7%  ¦  57.1% 42.9%  ¦  64.3% 35.7% 78.6% 21.4% 14.3%

Klikněte na vybraný sloupec, aby ste seřadili tabulku
Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds

AnnaBet Sila výkonnosti

Updated 2025-02-18 11:13:04
#Tým Rating
1. USA U20 1540
2. Kanada U20 1385
3. Švédsko U20 1365
4. Česko U20 1339
5. Finsko U20 1328
6. Rusko U20 1304
7. Bělorusko U20 1193
8. Slovensko U20 1121
9. Švýcarsko U20 1063
10. Dánsko U20 965


Our ratings are currently calculated from games played after 1.1.2000

In football our ratings are similar to World Football Elo Ratings but we have tuned up the formula. For example when goal difference is low or game is tied and we have shots on goal statistics available for the game, we’ll then analyze the shots ratio to have some effect on the ratings. For example if a game was tied 1-1 but home team outshoot away team by 10-2 you might say the home team was the better team despite the result.

In ice hockey the ratings are similar but we have taken account the higher number of goals scored and “home” team (first mentioned team) line change advantage. For example if ice hockey game Sweden – Finland was played at Finland but Sweden had the line change advantage it is then taken account when calculating ratings.

Some examples how ratings are adjusted after each game

In the beginning each team has starting rating of 1000 points. After each game played the sum of points change is 0: if home team gets +20 points then away team gets -20 pts deducted. Amount is always based on the weight/importance of the tournament: in friendlies teams get much less points than in World Cup finals.

Two equal teams meet: winner gets some decent points and loser looses the same amount. Example +20 / -20.
Heavy favorite (much higher rating) wins by few goals: gets only few points because it was very expected result. Your points rises very slowly by beating much poorer teams than you. Example +3 / -3.
Heavy favorite ties a game: favorite loses small amount of points because it was expected that the team should win, the opponent get some points. Example -3 / +3 points.
Heavy favorite loses a game: loses lots of rating points, winner gets lots of points. Example -40 / +40.

Sample Winning Expectancies

Difference
in Ratings
Higher
Rated
Lower
Rated
0 0.500 0.500
10 0.514 0.486
20 0.529 0.471
30 0.543 0.457
40 0.557 0.443
50 0.571 0.429
60 0.585 0.415
70 0.599 0.401
80 0.613 0.387
90 0.627 0.373
100 0.640 0.360
110 0.653 0.347
120 0.666 0.334
130 0.679 0.321
140 0.691 0.309
150 0.703 0.297
160 0.715 0.285
170 0.727 0.273
180 0.738 0.262
190 0.749 0.251
200 0.760 0.240

Table by Eloratings.net

Why are Power Ratings better than winning percentage or league table?

Let’s say we have 2 teams whose performance we are analyzing: Finland and Sweden. Both teams have played 8 games and Finland has 6 wins and 2 losses, Sweden 5 wins and 3 losses. You might say Finland is the better team based on that info? What if Finland has won 4 games against poor teams, 2 against mediocre and lost 2 against better teams. Sweden on the other hand had win 3 games against better teams, 2 against mediocre and then 3 narrow losses against mediocre teams. Putting it that way, you might not believe Finland should be a favorite here after all. Would our Power Ratings tell you the exactly same thing:

Finland starting rating 1000:

1. game 4-0 win against poor team +10 pts (1010)
2. game 3-1 win against poor team +6 pts (1016)
3. game 0-2 loss against better team -10 pts (1006)
4. game 4-3 win against mediocre team +15 pts (1021)
5. game 5-3 win against mediocre team +18 pts (1039)
6. game 3-5 loss against better team -10 pts (1029)
7. game 2-0 win against poor team +6 pts (1035)
8. game 5-2 win against poor team +8 pts (1043)
Current rating 1043

Sweden starting rating 1000:

1. game 3-2 win against better team +25 pts (1025)
2. game 2-3 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1013)
3. game 4-2 win against better team +30 pts (1043)
4. game 3-0 win against mediocre team +20 pts (1063)
5. game 3-5 loss against mediocre team -15 pts (1048)
6. game 3-4 loss against mediocre team -12 pts (1036)
7. game 4-1 win against better team +35 pts (1071)
8. game 3-1 win against mediocre team +16 pts (1087)
Current rating 1087

These are just rough examples for you to get the idea.

Finland vs Sweden Power Ratings: 1043 – 1087, ratings difference 44 and by looking at the table above you can see that this game should be about Finland 46% winning chance and Sweden 54%. Note that home advantage is usually about 100 points so 46%-54% would be only at neutral venue.

It is not always about how many games you have won but rather which teams and by how many goals that tells more about your true Power. But still remember these are only computer calculated estimations and does not take account real world situations like injuries, weather etc. Also note Power Ratings being much less accurate when teams have a big difference between number of games played and/or quality/diversity of tournaments where they have played.

For example in ice hockey USA and Canada plays only few friendly matches before major tournaments and European teams plays a lots of smaller tournaments - and also playing many games against couple of selected opponents only. Smaller tournaments and friendly matches makes of course smaller changes to Power Ratings than major tournaments but when you play a lot of smaller games it can add up.