# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | FC Bayern München |
28 |
23 |
5 |
82% |
89.3 |
77.6 |
+11.7 |
2. | Chemnitz |
29 |
23 |
6 |
79% |
89.6 |
78.6 |
+10.9 |
3. | Alba Berlin |
27 |
22 |
5 |
81% |
91.7 |
82.0 |
+9.7 |
4. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
29 |
20 |
9 |
69% |
92.2 |
85.7 |
+6.6 |
5. | S.Oliver Baskets |
29 |
20 |
9 |
69% |
86.0 |
79.3 |
+6.7 |
6. | Rasta Vechta |
29 |
18 |
11 |
62% |
89.0 |
82.4 |
+6.5 |
7. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
29 |
17 |
12 |
59% |
88.4 |
81.8 |
+6.7 |
8. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
29 |
17 |
12 |
59% |
89.5 |
85.9 |
+3.6 |
9. | Oldenburg |
29 |
15 |
14 |
52% |
85.0 |
83.9 |
+1.1 |
10. | Hamburg |
29 |
14 |
15 |
48% |
85.3 |
86.5 |
-1.2 |
11. | Braunschweig |
29 |
12 |
17 |
41% |
82.4 |
85.9 |
-3.5 |
12. | Brose Baskets |
29 |
12 |
17 |
41% |
88.2 |
90.9 |
-2.7 |
13. | Rostock Seawolves |
28 |
8 |
20 |
29% |
88.6 |
93.4 |
-4.7 |
14. | BG Göttingen |
29 |
9 |
20 |
31% |
86.5 |
94.1 |
-7.6 |
15. | USC Heidelberg |
29 |
8 |
21 |
28% |
82.7 |
94.0 |
-11.3 |
16. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
29 |
8 |
21 |
28% |
85.1 |
92.8 |
-7.7 |
17. | Crailsheim Merlins |
29 |
7 |
22 |
24% |
81.3 |
92.6 |
-11.3 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
29 |
6 |
23 |
21% |
84.0 |
96.7 |
-12.6 |
# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | FC Bayern München |
14 |
13 |
1 |
93% |
90.6 |
75.7 |
+14.9 |
2. | Alba Berlin |
13 |
12 |
1 |
92% |
96.3 |
81.2 |
+15.1 |
3. | Chemnitz |
14 |
12 |
2 |
86% |
87.8 |
74.3 |
+13.5 |
4. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
92.5 |
87.6 |
+4.9 |
5. | S.Oliver Baskets |
15 |
10 |
5 |
67% |
84.9 |
77.7 |
+7.2 |
6. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
14 |
10 |
4 |
71% |
89.6 |
82.4 |
+7.3 |
7. | Rasta Vechta |
14 |
9 |
5 |
64% |
88.9 |
81.1 |
+7.7 |
8. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
15 |
9 |
6 |
60% |
88.7 |
81.6 |
+7.1 |
9. | Braunschweig |
14 |
8 |
6 |
57% |
88.4 |
86.9 |
+1.6 |
10. | Oldenburg |
14 |
8 |
6 |
57% |
85.1 |
83.6 |
+1.5 |
11. | Brose Baskets |
14 |
8 |
6 |
57% |
90.0 |
86.3 |
+3.7 |
12. | Hamburg |
14 |
7 |
7 |
50% |
84.7 |
84.7 |
0.0 |
13. | BG Göttingen |
15 |
7 |
8 |
47% |
89.2 |
93.1 |
-3.9 |
14. | Crailsheim Merlins |
14 |
6 |
8 |
43% |
83.6 |
89.4 |
-5.8 |
15. | Rostock Seawolves |
15 |
5 |
10 |
33% |
89.0 |
94.9 |
-5.9 |
16. | USC Heidelberg |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
82.7 |
94.1 |
-11.5 |
17. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
86.1 |
94.3 |
-8.2 |
18. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
15 |
3 |
12 |
20% |
84.3 |
95.7 |
-11.3 |
# |
Equipo |
PJ |
PG |
PP |
PG% |
ØPF |
ØPC |
ØDG |
1. | Chemnitz |
15 |
11 |
4 |
73% |
91.2 |
82.7 |
+8.5 |
2. | FC Bayern München |
14 |
10 |
4 |
71% |
87.9 |
79.4 |
+8.5 |
3. | S.Oliver Baskets |
14 |
10 |
4 |
71% |
87.2 |
81.1 |
+6.1 |
4. | Alba Berlin |
14 |
10 |
4 |
71% |
87.4 |
82.6 |
+4.7 |
5. | Ratiopharm Ulm |
14 |
9 |
5 |
64% |
92.0 |
83.6 |
+8.4 |
6. | Rasta Vechta |
15 |
9 |
6 |
60% |
89.1 |
83.7 |
+5.4 |
7. | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
14 |
8 |
6 |
57% |
88.1 |
82.0 |
+6.1 |
8. | Oldenburg |
15 |
7 |
8 |
47% |
84.8 |
84.1 |
+0.7 |
9. | Telekom Baskets Bonn |
15 |
7 |
8 |
47% |
89.3 |
89.2 |
+0.1 |
10. | Hamburg |
15 |
7 |
8 |
47% |
85.8 |
88.1 |
-2.3 |
11. | Braunschweig |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
76.8 |
85.0 |
-8.2 |
12. | Brose Baskets |
15 |
4 |
11 |
27% |
86.5 |
95.1 |
-8.6 |
13. | USC Heidelberg |
14 |
4 |
10 |
29% |
82.6 |
93.8 |
-11.1 |
14. | Rostock Seawolves |
13 |
3 |
10 |
23% |
88.2 |
91.6 |
-3.4 |
15. | Mitteldeutscher BC |
14 |
4 |
10 |
29% |
84.1 |
91.2 |
-7.1 |
16. | Walter Tigers Tübing |
14 |
3 |
11 |
21% |
83.7 |
97.7 |
-14.0 |
17. | BG Göttingen |
14 |
2 |
12 |
14% |
83.6 |
95.1 |
-11.6 |
18. | Crailsheim Merlins |
15 |
1 |
14 |
7% |
79.1 |
95.5 |
-16.4 |
Haga clic en cualquier columna para ordenar la tabla Porcentajes mouseover (%) para ver las probabilidades de valor | Seleccione una temporada
Sitio web oficial
Wikipedia |