2nd Round Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
24 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
49 |
15 |
+34 |
59 |
2.46 |
79% |
2.04 |
0.62 |
2. | Meizhou Hakka |
24 |
17 |
2 |
5 |
61 |
26 |
+35 |
53 |
2.21 |
71% |
2.54 |
1.08 |
3. | Zhejiang Professiona |
24 |
16 |
5 |
3 |
48 |
18 |
+30 |
53 |
2.21 |
67% |
2.00 |
0.75 |
4. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
24 |
15 |
5 |
4 |
62 |
18 |
+44 |
50 |
2.08 |
62% |
2.58 |
0.75 |
5. | Nantong Zhiyun |
24 |
14 |
3 |
7 |
45 |
19 |
+26 |
45 |
1.88 |
58% |
1.88 |
0.79 |
6. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
24 |
12 |
8 |
4 |
40 |
21 |
+19 |
44 |
1.83 |
50% |
1.67 |
0.88 |
7. | Shenzhen Peng City |
24 |
10 |
9 |
5 |
26 |
23 |
+3 |
39 |
1.62 |
42% |
1.08 |
0.96 |
8. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
24 |
9 |
10 |
5 |
36 |
29 |
+7 |
37 |
1.54 |
38% |
1.50 |
1.21 |
9. | Kunshan FC |
24 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
37 |
23 |
+14 |
36 |
1.50 |
42% |
1.54 |
0.96 |
10. | Zibo Cuju |
24 |
10 |
5 |
9 |
27 |
34 |
-7 |
35 |
1.46 |
42% |
1.12 |
1.42 |
11. | Nanjing City |
24 |
9 |
5 |
10 |
34 |
33 |
+1 |
32 |
1.33 |
38% |
1.42 |
1.38 |
12. | Beijing Sport Univer |
24 |
6 |
7 |
11 |
30 |
36 |
-6 |
25 |
1.04 |
25% |
1.25 |
1.50 |
13. | Guizhou FC |
24 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
18 |
48 |
-30 |
24 |
1.00 |
25% |
0.75 |
2.00 |
14. | Jiangxi Lushan |
24 |
5 |
6 |
13 |
19 |
48 |
-29 |
21 |
0.88 |
21% |
0.79 |
2.00 |
15. | Suzhou Dongwu |
24 |
4 |
7 |
13 |
25 |
40 |
-15 |
19 |
0.79 |
17% |
1.04 |
1.67 |
16. | Liaoning Tieren |
24 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
17 |
48 |
-31 |
12 |
0.50 |
12% |
0.71 |
2.00 |
17. | Beijing 361º |
24 |
2 |
4 |
18 |
13 |
57 |
-44 |
10 |
0.42 |
8% |
0.54 |
2.38 |
18. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
24 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
8 |
59 |
-51 |
5 |
0.21 |
0% |
0.33 |
2.46 |
Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Meizhou Hakka |
10 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
18 |
9 |
+9 |
22 |
2.20 |
70% |
1.80 |
0.90 |
2. | Zhejiang Professiona |
10 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
21 |
10 |
+11 |
21 |
2.10 |
60% |
2.10 |
1.00 |
3. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
10 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
15 |
9 |
+6 |
18 |
1.80 |
50% |
1.50 |
0.90 |
4. | Shenzhen Peng City |
10 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
+4 |
13 |
1.30 |
30% |
0.80 |
0.40 |
5. | Zibo Cuju |
10 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
18 |
-13 |
4 |
0.40 |
0% |
0.50 |
1.80 |
6. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
10 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
8 |
25 |
-17 |
4 |
0.40 |
10% |
0.80 |
2.50 |
Group B
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
10 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
19 |
10 |
+9 |
21 |
2.10 |
60% |
1.90 |
1.00 |
2. | Nantong Zhiyun |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
11 |
+6 |
20 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.70 |
1.10 |
3. | Kunshan FC |
10 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
19 |
12 |
+7 |
15 |
1.50 |
30% |
1.90 |
1.20 |
4. | Nanjing City |
10 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
-2 |
13 |
1.30 |
30% |
0.70 |
0.90 |
5. | Jiangxi Lushan |
10 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
20 |
-10 |
8 |
0.80 |
20% |
1.00 |
2.00 |
6. | Beijing Sport Univer |
10 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
17 |
-10 |
3 |
0.30 |
0% |
0.70 |
1.70 |
Group C
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
10 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
24 |
10 |
+14 |
20 |
2.00 |
60% |
2.40 |
1.00 |
2. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
10 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
14 |
11 |
+3 |
19 |
1.90 |
60% |
1.40 |
1.10 |
3. | Guizhou FC |
10 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
15 |
1.50 |
40% |
0.80 |
0.80 |
4. | Liaoning Tieren |
10 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
13 |
14 |
-1 |
13 |
1.30 |
40% |
1.30 |
1.40 |
5. | Suzhou Dongwu |
10 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
13 |
-2 |
13 |
1.30 |
30% |
1.10 |
1.30 |
6. | Beijing 361º |
10 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
11 |
25 |
-14 |
4 |
0.40 |
10% |
1.10 |
2.50 |
2nd Round Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
12 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
7 |
+23 |
34 |
2.83 |
92% |
2.50 |
0.58 |
2. | Zhejiang Professiona |
12 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
7 |
+21 |
33 |
2.75 |
92% |
2.33 |
0.58 |
3. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
12 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
28 |
8 |
+20 |
26 |
2.17 |
67% |
2.33 |
0.67 |
4. | Meizhou Hakka |
12 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
30 |
16 |
+14 |
25 |
2.08 |
67% |
2.50 |
1.33 |
5. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
12 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
19 |
7 |
+12 |
25 |
2.08 |
58% |
1.58 |
0.58 |
6. | Nantong Zhiyun |
12 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
26 |
13 |
+13 |
22 |
1.83 |
58% |
2.17 |
1.08 |
7. | Shenzhen Peng City |
12 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
6 |
+6 |
22 |
1.83 |
50% |
1.00 |
0.50 |
8. | Nanjing City |
12 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
15 |
+4 |
20 |
1.67 |
50% |
1.58 |
1.25 |
9. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
12 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
18 |
14 |
+4 |
20 |
1.67 |
42% |
1.50 |
1.17 |
10. | Kunshan FC |
12 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
+5 |
17 |
1.42 |
42% |
1.25 |
0.83 |
11. | Zibo Cuju |
12 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
18 |
-8 |
15 |
1.25 |
33% |
0.83 |
1.50 |
12. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
17 |
-3 |
12 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.17 |
1.42 |
13. | Guizhou FC |
12 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
25 |
-17 |
10 |
0.83 |
17% |
0.67 |
2.08 |
14. | Liaoning Tieren |
12 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
12 |
29 |
-17 |
8 |
0.67 |
17% |
1.00 |
2.42 |
15. | Jiangxi Lushan |
12 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
29 |
-19 |
7 |
0.58 |
8% |
0.83 |
2.42 |
16. | Suzhou Dongwu |
12 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
16 |
-7 |
6 |
0.50 |
0% |
0.75 |
1.33 |
17. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
7 |
28 |
-21 |
3 |
0.25 |
0% |
0.58 |
2.33 |
18. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
12 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
32 |
-29 |
2 |
0.17 |
0% |
0.25 |
2.67 |
Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Meizhou Hakka |
5 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
+6 |
12 |
2.40 |
80% |
2.00 |
0.80 |
2. | Zhejiang Professiona |
5 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
12 |
7 |
+5 |
11 |
2.20 |
60% |
2.40 |
1.40 |
3. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
4 |
+5 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.80 |
0.80 |
4. | Shenzhen Peng City |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
+1 |
8 |
1.60 |
40% |
0.60 |
0.40 |
5. | Zibo Cuju |
5 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
-5 |
3 |
0.60 |
0% |
0.40 |
1.40 |
6. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
5 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
-9 |
3 |
0.60 |
20% |
0.60 |
2.40 |
Group B
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Nantong Zhiyun |
5 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
6 |
+4 |
12 |
2.40 |
80% |
2.00 |
1.20 |
2. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
6 |
+4 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
2.00 |
1.20 |
3. | Kunshan FC |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
+6 |
7 |
1.40 |
20% |
2.20 |
1.00 |
4. | Nanjing City |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
1.20 |
20% |
0.60 |
0.60 |
5. | Jiangxi Lushan |
5 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
-5 |
2 |
0.40 |
0% |
1.00 |
2.00 |
6. | Beijing Sport Univer |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
8 |
-6 |
0 |
0.00 |
0% |
0.40 |
1.60 |
Group C
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
+1 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.00 |
0.80 |
2. | Suzhou Dongwu |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.40 |
1.40 |
3. | Wuhan Three Towns |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
7 |
+2 |
7 |
1.40 |
40% |
1.80 |
1.40 |
4. | Guizhou FC |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
7 |
1.40 |
40% |
1.00 |
1.00 |
5. | Liaoning Tieren |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
-3 |
4 |
0.80 |
20% |
1.20 |
1.80 |
6. | Beijing 361º |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
11 |
-5 |
4 |
0.80 |
20% |
1.20 |
2.20 |
2nd Round Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Meizhou Hakka |
12 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
31 |
10 |
+21 |
28 |
2.33 |
75% |
2.58 |
0.83 |
2. | Wuhan Three Towns |
12 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
8 |
+11 |
25 |
2.08 |
67% |
1.58 |
0.67 |
3. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
12 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
34 |
10 |
+24 |
24 |
2.00 |
58% |
2.83 |
0.83 |
4. | Nantong Zhiyun |
12 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
19 |
6 |
+13 |
23 |
1.92 |
58% |
1.58 |
0.50 |
5. | Zhejiang Professiona |
12 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
20 |
11 |
+9 |
20 |
1.67 |
42% |
1.67 |
0.92 |
6. | Zibo Cuju |
12 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
17 |
16 |
+1 |
20 |
1.67 |
50% |
1.42 |
1.33 |
7. | Kunshan FC |
12 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
22 |
13 |
+9 |
19 |
1.58 |
42% |
1.83 |
1.08 |
8. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
12 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
21 |
14 |
+7 |
19 |
1.58 |
42% |
1.75 |
1.17 |
9. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
12 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
18 |
15 |
+3 |
17 |
1.42 |
33% |
1.50 |
1.25 |
10. | Shenzhen Peng City |
12 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
14 |
17 |
-3 |
17 |
1.42 |
33% |
1.17 |
1.42 |
11. | Jiangxi Lushan |
12 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
9 |
19 |
-10 |
14 |
1.17 |
33% |
0.75 |
1.58 |
12. | Guizhou FC |
12 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
23 |
-13 |
14 |
1.17 |
33% |
0.83 |
1.92 |
13. | Beijing Sport Univer |
12 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
16 |
19 |
-3 |
13 |
1.08 |
25% |
1.33 |
1.58 |
14. | Suzhou Dongwu |
12 |
4 |
1 |
7 |
16 |
24 |
-8 |
13 |
1.08 |
33% |
1.33 |
2.00 |
15. | Nanjing City |
12 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
15 |
18 |
-3 |
12 |
1.00 |
25% |
1.25 |
1.50 |
16. | Beijing 361º |
12 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
6 |
29 |
-23 |
7 |
0.58 |
17% |
0.50 |
2.42 |
17. | Liaoning Tieren |
12 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
5 |
19 |
-14 |
4 |
0.33 |
8% |
0.42 |
1.58 |
18. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
12 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
27 |
-22 |
3 |
0.25 |
0% |
0.42 |
2.25 |
Group A
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Zhejiang Professiona |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
3 |
+6 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.80 |
0.60 |
2. | Meizhou Hakka |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
5 |
+3 |
10 |
2.00 |
60% |
1.60 |
1.00 |
3. | Shaanxi Chang'an Ath |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
+1 |
8 |
1.60 |
40% |
1.20 |
1.00 |
4. | Shenzhen Peng City |
5 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
+3 |
5 |
1.00 |
20% |
1.00 |
0.40 |
5. | Xinjiang Tianshan Le |
5 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
13 |
-8 |
1 |
0.20 |
0% |
1.00 |
2.60 |
6. | Zibo Cuju |
5 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
-8 |
1 |
0.20 |
0% |
0.60 |
2.20 |
Group B
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Chengdu Rongcheng |
5 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
9 |
4 |
+5 |
11 |
2.20 |
60% |
1.80 |
0.80 |
2. | Nantong Zhiyun |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
5 |
+2 |
8 |
1.60 |
40% |
1.40 |
1.00 |
3. | Kunshan FC |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
7 |
+1 |
8 |
1.60 |
40% |
1.60 |
1.40 |
4. | Nanjing City |
5 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
-2 |
7 |
1.40 |
40% |
0.80 |
1.20 |
5. | Jiangxi Lushan |
5 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
-5 |
6 |
1.20 |
40% |
1.00 |
2.00 |
6. | Beijing Sport Univer |
5 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
9 |
-4 |
3 |
0.60 |
0% |
1.00 |
1.80 |
Group C
# |
Tým |
Z |
V |
R |
P |
VG |
OG |
Diff |
B |
B/Z |
V% |
ØVG |
ØOG |
1. | Wuhan Three Towns |
5 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
+12 |
13 |
2.60 |
80% |
3.00 |
0.60 |
2. | Heilongjiang Ice Cit |
5 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
7 |
+2 |
9 |
1.80 |
60% |
1.80 |
1.40 |
3. | Liaoning Tieren |
5 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
5 |
+2 |
9 |
1.80 |
60% |
1.40 |
1.00 |
4. | Guizhou FC |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
8 |
1.60 |
40% |
0.60 |
0.60 |
5. | Suzhou Dongwu |
5 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
-2 |
3 |
0.60 |
0% |
0.80 |
1.20 |
6. | Beijing 361º |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
14 |
-9 |
0 |
0.00 |
0% |
1.00 |
2.80 |
Klikněte na vybraný sloupec, aby ste seřadili tabulku Mouseover percentages (%) to see value odds | Vybrát sezónu
Oficiální stránka
Wikipedia |